ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Decker, Gero" <Gero.Dec...@hpi.uni-potsdam.de>
Subject AW: GSOC project ideas
Date Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:25:45 GMT
Hi everyone,

Oryx is currently using Ext 2.0.2 (LGPL) in the modeling mode. For a debugger we wouldn't
even need to ship the Ext-parts. 
Our Mashup-API depends on YUI 2.7.0.

All Oryx code is MIT.

Regarding SVG vs. Canvas: We experimented with Canvas a while back when it was still rather
rudimentary. We might consider switching sometime this year but this is not for sure yet.
We would need some thorough performance testing before that step.


Von: Tammo van Lessen [tvanlessen@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 21:11
An: dev@ode.apache.org
Betreff: Re: GSOC project ideas


The core of Oryx is AFAIK MIT licensed. It's just the editor part that
uses extjs. For a debugger we'd only need a minimal Oryx server, which
would be in this case also under MIT license (no extjs, no GPL). Gero
may correct me if I'm wrong.

So I don't see any license issues in that case.


phan huy wrote:
> Hmm, maybe I should wait for more responds from Oryx and AODE developers.
> 2009/3/13 Alex Boisvert <boisvert@intalio.com>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Ciaran <ciaranj@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I don't believe that EXTJS' license is compatible with the existing ODE
>>> licenses? Would this not cause
>>> you some issues ?
>> It depends what is meant by "incompatible".  The GPLv3 is compatible with
>> ASLv2 although it is Apache policy to not distribute GPL'ed software so
>> it's
>> wouldn't be a very good choice for this project.
>> alex

Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de
View raw message