ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tammo van Lessen <tvanles...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Ode DAO Impl status (Hibernate, OpenJPA, MemImpl)
Date Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:26:27 GMT
+1, I think that makes sense. Nevertheless, if I recall correctly, both
layers make use of non-standard JPA features, that might raise some issues.

Thanks,
  Tammo

Milinda Pathirage wrote:
> +1 for the migration and separate out JPA implementation specific stuff in
> trunk. Also we should consider about improvements to JPA based
> implementation.
> 
> Thanks
> Milinda
> 
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Greg Lucas <greg.lucas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1, that sounds cleaner.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:12:31 -0500, Rafal Rusin <rafal.rusin@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  +1 from me for migrating OpenJPA to JPA (supporting OpenJPA +
>>> Hibernate JPA) + dropping dao-hib in ODE trunk.
>>>
>>> 2009/11/16 Jeff Yu <jeff.yuchang@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I looked into our Ode DAO impl , it has three implementations at the
>>>> moment,
>>>> one is Hibernate, one is Memdao, which I thought it is meant to be used
>>>> in
>>>> test environment, the other one is JPA, but it ties to openJPA somehow,
>>>> as
>>>> it uses the some OpenJPA API directly in the implementation.
>>>>
>>>> Searched the 'hibernate openjpa' keyword in our maillist, only found this
>>>> thread(http://ode.markmail.org/message/mjqsz6ehykpzbons), which is back
>>>> in
>>>> Dec, 2008.  Little info about these info. Well, I am trying to deploy Ode
>>>> with hibernate as JPA provider. But I learnt from an email that we may
>>>> drop
>>>> hibernate implementation in the future, is this still the case? If so, I
>>>> guess we won't provide the migration tool for users from 1.3.x to 2.x
>>>> version. Will we provide a migration tool from the hibernate -> openjpa?
>>>>
>>>> One thing that I didn't fully understand is that we've already tried to
>>>> use
>>>> the JPA as our second level of abstraction for the DAO, (the first level
>>>> abstraction I see is our DAO interface), but I see we tied this impl into
>>>> OpenJPA by using following classes.
>>>>
>>>> import org.apache.openjpa.ee.ManagedRuntime;
>>>> import org.apache.openjpa.util.GeneralException;
>>>>
>>>> import org.apache.openjpa.persistence.OpenJPAPersistence;
>>>> import org.apache.openjpa.persistence.OpenJPAQuery;
>>>>
>>>> It would be great that we can abstract these classes out from our jpa
>>>> module, so that openjpa and hibernate can have its own impl. I understand
>>>> the generated schema is pretty different in the openjpa and hibernate,
>>>> but
>>>> they are transparent to users/developers. I meant, as long as they are
>>>> using
>>>> the right combination (Hibernate + hibernate generated schema, or OpenJPA
>>>> +
>>>> OpenJPA generated schema), they should be fine.
>>>>
>>>> I've noticed that in the hibernate implementation, it is using the
>>>> hibernate
>>>> specifc annotation, which seems to me that it hasn't been actively
>>>> developed
>>>> for a long time.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to see us using the JPA in its impl, and can be deployed in any
>>>> JPA
>>>> provider, in this case, it would be easy for users to deploy ode into any
>>>> JEE application server. I didn't know whats our plan for our DAO impl,
>>>> both
>>>> for the 1.3.x and 2.0 version.  Also, some background on this and some
>>>> issues that we've had in the implementation would be of great helpful to
>>>> me.
>>>>
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message