ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sathwik B P <sathwik...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODE 1.3.7
Date Wed, 05 Jul 2017 13:59:22 GMT
Hadrain, Paul,
Kindly refer
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-1043

On Jul 5, 2017 19:20, "Paul Brown" <paulrbrown@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for the release. And going to JDK 8 would be reasonable.
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 06:30 Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the release as well.
> >
> > Sorry for the delay, 4th of July is my excuse :). Release looks good,
> > tested with Java8. Your notes say that minimum compatibility is JDK 6,
> > but I wonder if that's still in use and if we shouldn't bump up to JDK 7
> > or even 8. The new console is nice, I'll have more comments about it in
> > another thread.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hadrian
> >
> > On 07/03/2017 02:02 PM, Tammo van Lessen wrote:
> > > Sounds good to me. Regarding the dropping: I think we can still release
> > the
> > > 1.3.7 JBI binaries to maven central so that brave people can try it
> with
> > > their very old servicemix and java version. But we should drop the
> > official
> > > support for JBI and should not copy it to the dist svn. Would you
> agree?
> > >
> > > And regarding Hadrians +1, does this count as a +1 for the release? ;)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >    Tammo
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Sathwik B P <sathwik.bp@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks tammo, for taking your time amid tight schedule to test the
> > release
> > >> artifacts.
> > >>
> > >> For sometime now since the release of 1.3.6  there has been no
> traction
> > on
> > >> user/dev forums for JBI based deployment in ODE.
> > >>
> > >> I agree with Tammo & Hadrain to drop ODE's JBI distribution.
> > >>
> > >> I suppose we keep a different vote to drop JBI support unless there is
> > any
> > >> customer who is depending on it.
> > >>
> > >> Just to keep things simple and focused.
> > >> Will raise a seperate vote to drop JBI support, before going in for
> the
> > ODE
> > >> war and Tomee based release artifacts.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Sathwik
> > >>
> > >> On Jul 3, 2017 19:39, "Hadrian Zbarcea" <hzbarcea@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> With the 4.0 Servicemix moved to an OSGi kernel which was later spun
> > off
> > >>> and moved to Felix from where it became the independent TLP Apache
> > Karaf.
> > >>> Servicemix uses Karaf as it's kernel. Support for JBI was dropped
> > because
> > >>> of JBI's failure to get enough traction.
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 for Tammo's proposal.
> > >>>
> > >>> Hadrian
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 07/03/2017 09:41 AM, Tammo van Lessen wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks Sathwik for managing the release, opening the vote and
> keeping
> > it
> > >>>> open for busy-me to have some time for testing.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I did smoketests for both, war and tomee releases. Both went
> > >> flawlessly. I
> > >>>> could not test the the jbi deployment with recent servicemix
> versions,
> > >>>> since they have dropped the support for jbi. I tried the last
> > >>>> jbi-containing version, but this did not event start with my local
> > Java
> > >> 8.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'd suggest to publicly release only the war and tomee artifacts
and
> > >>>> depreciate the support for servicemix.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Here is my +1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>>     Tammo
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Am 24.05.2017 10:53 schrieb "Sathwik B P" <sathwik.bp@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi Devs,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is a reminder to test the release artifacts and cast your
> votes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Sathwik
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Apr 26, 2017 15:22, "Sathwik B P" <sathwik.bp@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> We have got the release build for ODE 1.3.7. We have kept
out the
> > old
> > >>>>>> web
> > >>>>>> console from the source and binary distributions in accordance
> with
> > >> the
> > >>>>>> licensing issues with json.org as per the direction from
the
> Apache
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> Legal.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The most notable improvements:
> > >>>>>>     - Moved to minimum binary compatibility to JDK 6 from
JDK 5.
> > >>>>>>     - ODE server with embedded Apache Tomee.
> > >>>>>>     - New ODE management console based on AngularJS.
> > >>>>>>     - Upgrade of Axis2, OpenJPA, Hibernate.
> > >>>>>>     - Moved to SLF4J logging with Log4j2 as the implementation.
> > >>>>>>     - There is database migration required from earlier
versions.
> > >>>>>>     - Some major memory leaks have been fixed.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - Release notes:
> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> > >>>>>> ctId=12310270&version=12324967
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - Staging repository:
> > >>>>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheode-1003
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> All the 3 (axis2, jbi, tomee based new ODE server) distributions
> are
> > >>>>>> available for download @
> > >>>>>> - Dev dist:
> > >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ode
> > >>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.2/>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Each of the distributions has an sql folder which contains
all the
> > >>>>>> database schemas for OPENJPA/HIBERNATE. Use the relevant
schema as
> > per
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> persistence framework.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - Keys file:
> > >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ode/KEYS
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - Tag on github:
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ode/tree/APACHE_ODE_1.3.7
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Migration Testing from 1.3.6, kindly follow the ticket:
> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ODE-1051
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Kindly read the SQL Script here:
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ode/blob/APACHE_ODE_1.3.7/schema-u
> > >>>>>> pdates/migrate-ode-1.3.6-to-1.3.7.sql
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> All ODE users are welcome to test and report.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Here is my +1
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> regards,
> > >>>>>> sathwik
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message