ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Hahn" <mhahn....@gmail.com>
Subject AW: Extension activities
Date Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:46:04 GMT
Hi Sathwik,

sure, the forked repo is available at: https://github.com/hahnml/ode

Best regards,
Michael

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2018 10:34
An: dev@ode.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Extension activities

Hi Micheal,

Thanks for the contribution.

Will have a look at it when I get sometime. Can you share your forked repo link?

regards,
sathwik

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Michael Hahn <mhahn.dev@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sathwik,
>
> as discussed I created a corresponding PR for porting the extension 
> activity support (https://github.com/apache/ode/pull/4).
> In addition, I added an initial BPEL REST extension activity bundle as 
> an example together with related test cases in 'bpel-test' project.
>
> Looking forward to your feedback, let me know if something is missing 
> or has to be adapted :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Michael
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 06:11
> An: dev@ode.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Extension activities
>
> Micheal,
> Am done with porting to trunk. You can start on your PR.
>
> On Nov 25, 2017 13:17, "Sathwik B P" <sathwik.bp@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > MIchael,
> >
> > Just hold on to making changes for the trunk, am bringing the 1.3.8 
> > commits from the release branch to the trunk. I should probably done 
> > in about 2-3 days. Major library upgrades are coming in.
> >
> > Just to summarize the changes in the trunk JACOB has been moved into 
> > a different sub project [https://github.com/apache/ode-jacob], the 
> > new OModel is here https://github.com/apache/ode/tree/master/bpel-nobj.
> >
> > The compiler has undergone changes. I believe porting of extension 
> > activities onto this new model will not be straight forward as the 
> > extension feature was built on the older OModel.
> >
> > regards,
> > sathwik
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Sathwik B P <sathwik.bp@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Micheal,
> >>
> >> I am working towards 1.3.8 release. We cannot bring the extension 
> >> activity feature on 1.3.x branch
> >>
> >> On Nov 24, 2017 15:46, "Michael Hahn" <mhahn.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Sathwik,
> >>>
> >>> thanks for the pointers.
> >>>
> >>> I've seen on GitHub that you are currently working on the "ode-1.3.x"
> >>> branch.
> >>> Should I also do the porting based on that branch or better on the 
> >>> master?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Michael
> >>>
> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>> Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. November 2017 14:52
> >>> An: dev@ode.apache.org
> >>> Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> >>>
> >>> Hi Hahn,
> >>>
> >>> Good to hear about your interest on porting Extension activities 
> >>> onto the trunk. It only exists in APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" branch.
> >>>
> >>> I suppose these should be the initial commits from Tammo, 
> >>> [ODE-159, ODE-160]
> >>> https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/5ef69232cc6f19cf2818dd1
> >>> b110416b959297126
> >>> https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/1d5fa185a77c944e8d4a708
> >>> b451611fa74d5c2dc
> >>>
> >>> You can just go up the commits if there are more.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> sathwik
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Michael Hahn 
> >>> <mhahn.dev@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > I'm actually very interested in the support of BPEL extension 
> >>> > activities in ODE and also willing to help to integrate/build 
> >>> > the feature :-) Some years ago I was able to successfully port 
> >>> > the extension activity support from the "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental"
> >>> > branch into an ODE 1.3.4 release.
> >>> >
> >>> > So, if someone can give me a pointer where to find the most 
> >>> > recent version of the extension activity related classes, I can 
> >>> > integrate the feature into the current trunk and provide the 
> >>> > result as a pull request. Else I can also simply go with the 
> >>> > version in the "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" branch as a starting point.
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> > Michael
> >>> >
> >>> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>> > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik@apache.org]
> >>> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017 15:53
> >>> > An: dev@ode.apache.org
> >>> > Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> >>> >
> >>> > Hi Oliver,
> >>> >
> >>> > ODE 2.0 branch was an experimental branch and is not maintained 
> >>> > since a very long time. I will have to revisit it myself, in 
> >>> > case it involves changes to the ODE object model, then we cannot 
> >>> > bring it on any of 1.3.x releases because of chances of breaking 
> >>> > binary
> >>> compatibilities.
> >>> >
> >>> > In order to make new features available, we moved towards JSON 
> >>> > based state serialization away from JAVA serialization in the 
> >>> > trunk which is in 1.4 release.
> >>> >
> >>> > Currently, we are seeking new committers, you might want to 
> >>> > discuss the feature that you are willing to contribute and 
> >>> > probably help us
> >>> build it.
> >>> >
> >>> > regards,
> >>> > sathwik
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Oliver Kopp 
> >>> > <kopp.dev@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hi,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > In the context of our usage, we rely on BPEL extension 
> >>> > > activity support within ODE for enabling the invocation of 
> >>> > > REST APIs through a corresponding extension bundle. We 
> >>> > > therefore ported the extension activity support from the 
> >>> > > 2.0-alpha branch (already some years ago and therefore not up

> >>> > > to date with "latest" version on GitHub) into the current 
> >>> > > 1.3.7 release build which works. The problem is that by 
> >>> > > changing the source code of the official ODE 1.3.7 release, we

> >>> > > have to ship our extended version of ODE and take over 
> >>> > > responsibilities regarding licenses, etc. Therefore, it would

> >>> > > be really nice if there will be an ODE 1.3.x release with 
> >>> > > integrated extension activity support, so that we can 
> >>> > > use/refer to ODE as it is and as a result treat it as a ready

> >>> > > to use open source middleware such as
> Tomcat, we just use within our ecosystem.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Do you see any chance to release a corresponding distribution

> >>> > > that contains extension activity support in the near future?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > In return we are really interested in open sourcing our 
> >>> > > BPEL4REST extension bundle so that it can be shipped as a 
> >>> > > feature
> with ODE!
> >>> > > 👨‍🔧
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Cheers,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Oliver
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>


Mime
View raw message