ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "mhahn.dev" <mhahn....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Extension activities
Date Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:07:29 GMT
Hi Sathwik,
do you already have an idea when the changes might become part of an official release?
Best regards,Michael
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------Von: Sathwik B P <sathwik.bp@gmail.com> Datum:
30.01.18  11:28  (GMT+01:00) An: dev@ode.apache.org Betreff: Re: Extension activities 
Hi Michael,

Thanks for your contribution. Your PR has been merged.

regards,
sathwik


On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:04 PM, Michael Hahn <mhahn.dev@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sathwik,
>
> sure!
>
> I merged your commits into my fork and replaced the tabs with spaces
> (hopefully) in all affected source files.
> The PR should reflect the updates now.
>
> By the way, is there any source code formatting guideline/template for ODE
> to avoid conflicts in future? :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Michael
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 29. Januar 2018 11:53
> An: dev@ode.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Extension activities
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> I had a brief look and it seems good to me.
> The PR has a lot of tabs in the source, would it be possible to remove
> them and resubmit the PR? I also have updgraded trunk to JAVA 8, there are
> couple of commit for it from the point when your repo forked, can you take
> it up in your repo and the new PR should be a smooth checkin.
>
> Would that be possible?
>
> regards,
> sathwik
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Michael Hahn <mhahn.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sathwik,
> >
> > sure, the forked repo is available at: https://github.com/hahnml/ode
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Michael
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2018 10:34
> > An: dev@ode.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> >
> > Hi Micheal,
> >
> > Thanks for the contribution.
> >
> > Will have a look at it when I get sometime. Can you share your forked
> > repo link?
> >
> > regards,
> > sathwik
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Michael Hahn <mhahn.dev@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sathwik,
> > >
> > > as discussed I created a corresponding PR for porting the extension
> > > activity support (https://github.com/apache/ode/pull/4).
> > > In addition, I added an initial BPEL REST extension activity bundle
> > > as an example together with related test cases in 'bpel-test' project.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your feedback, let me know if something is
> > > missing or has to be adapted :-)
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 06:11
> > > An: dev@ode.apache.org
> > > Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> > >
> > > Micheal,
> > > Am done with porting to trunk. You can start on your PR.
> > >
> > > On Nov 25, 2017 13:17, "Sathwik B P" <sathwik.bp@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > MIchael,
> > > >
> > > > Just hold on to making changes for the trunk, am bringing the
> > > > 1.3.8 commits from the release branch to the trunk. I should
> > > > probably done in about 2-3 days. Major library upgrades are coming
> in.
> > > >
> > > > Just to summarize the changes in the trunk JACOB has been moved
> > > > into a different sub project
> > > > [https://github.com/apache/ode-jacob], the new OModel is here
> > > > https://github.com/apache/ode/tree/master/bpel-nobj
> > .
> > > >
> > > > The compiler has undergone changes. I believe porting of extension
> > > > activities onto this new model will not be straight forward as the
> > > > extension feature was built on the older OModel.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > sathwik
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Sathwik B P
> > > > <sathwik.bp@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Micheal,
> > > >>
> > > >> I am working towards 1.3.8 release. We cannot bring the extension
> > > >> activity feature on 1.3.x branch
> > > >>
> > > >> On Nov 24, 2017 15:46, "Michael Hahn" <mhahn.dev@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Sathwik,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> thanks for the pointers.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I've seen on GitHub that you are currently working on the
> "ode-1.3.x"
> > > >>> branch.
> > > >>> Should I also do the porting based on that branch or better on
> > > >>> the master?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Michael
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > >>> Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> > > >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. November 2017 14:52
> > > >>> An: dev@ode.apache.org
> > > >>> Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi Hahn,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Good to hear about your interest on porting Extension activities
> > > >>> onto the trunk. It only exists in APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental"
> > branch.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I suppose these should be the initial commits from Tammo,
> > > >>> [ODE-159, ODE-160]
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/5ef69232cc6f19cf2818dd1
> > > >>> b110416b959297126
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/1d5fa185a77c944e8d4a708
> > > >>> b451611fa74d5c2dc
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You can just go up the commits if there are more.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> regards,
> > > >>> sathwik
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Michael Hahn
> > > >>> <mhahn.dev@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Hi,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > I'm actually very interested in the support of BPEL extension
> > > >>> > activities in ODE and also willing to help to integrate/build
> > > >>> > the feature :-) Some years ago I was able to successfully
port
> > > >>> > the extension activity support from the
> > "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental"
> > > >>> > branch into an ODE 1.3.4 release.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > So, if someone can give me a pointer where to find the most
> > > >>> > recent version of the extension activity related classes,
I
> > > >>> > can integrate the feature into the current trunk and provide
> > > >>> > the result as a pull request. Else I can also simply go with
> > > >>> > the version in the "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" branch as
a
> > > >>> > starting
> > point.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Regards,
> > > >>> > Michael
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > >>> > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik@apache.org]
> > > >>> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017 15:53
> > > >>> > An: dev@ode.apache.org
> > > >>> > Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Hi Oliver,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > ODE 2.0 branch was an experimental branch and is not
> > > >>> > maintained since a very long time. I will have to revisit
it
> > > >>> > myself, in case it involves changes to the ODE object model,
> > > >>> > then we cannot bring it on any of 1.3.x releases because
of
> > > >>> > chances of breaking binary
> > > >>> compatibilities.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > In order to make new features available, we moved towards
JSON
> > > >>> > based state serialization away from JAVA serialization in
the
> > > >>> > trunk which is in 1.4 release.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Currently, we are seeking new committers, you might want
to
> > > >>> > discuss the feature that you are willing to contribute and
> > > >>> > probably help us
> > > >>> build it.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > regards,
> > > >>> > sathwik
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Oliver Kopp
> > > >>> > <kopp.dev@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > > Hi,
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > In the context of our usage, we rely on BPEL extension
> > > >>> > > activity support within ODE for enabling the invocation
of
> > > >>> > > REST APIs through a corresponding extension bundle.
We
> > > >>> > > therefore ported the extension activity support from
the
> > > >>> > > 2.0-alpha branch (already some years ago and therefore
not
> > > >>> > > up to date with "latest" version on GitHub) into the
current
> > > >>> > > 1.3.7 release build which works. The problem is that
by
> > > >>> > > changing the source code of the official ODE 1.3.7 release,
> > > >>> > > we have to ship our extended version of ODE and take
over
> > > >>> > > responsibilities regarding licenses, etc. Therefore,
it
> > > >>> > > would be really nice if there will be an ODE 1.3.x release
> > > >>> > > with integrated extension activity support, so that
we can
> > > >>> > > use/refer to ODE as it is and as a result treat it as
a
> > > >>> > > ready to use open source middleware such as
> > > Tomcat, we just use within our ecosystem.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Do you see any chance to release a corresponding
> > > >>> > > distribution that contains extension activity support
in the
> near future?
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > In return we are really interested in open sourcing
our
> > > >>> > > BPEL4REST extension bundle so that it can be shipped
as a
> > > >>> > > feature
> > > with ODE!
> > > >>> > > 👨‍🔧
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Cheers,
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Oliver
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message