ode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sathwik B P <sathwik...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Extension activities
Date Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:45:41 GMT
I dont have a timeline as of yet. The trunk has lot of changes. We need to
release the new JACOB implementation. Revisit the clustering implementation
based on hazelcast. We need to test migrations from 1.3.x versions from
java serialization to json based serialization. We need to document these.
All this is sitting on the trunk.

I am looking into releasing 1.3.8 now, which has major library upgrades
coming in.

Its needs time and assistance.

I have limited bandwidth.

On Feb 1, 2018 22:37, "mhahn.dev" <mhahn.dev@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Sathwik,
do you already have an idea when the changes might become part of an
official release?
Best regards,Michael
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------Von: Sathwik B P <
sathwik.bp@gmail.com> Datum: 30.01.18  11:28  (GMT+01:00) An:
dev@ode.apache.org Betreff: Re: Extension activities
Hi Michael,

Thanks for your contribution. Your PR has been merged.

regards,
sathwik


On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:04 PM, Michael Hahn <mhahn.dev@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sathwik,
>
> sure!
>
> I merged your commits into my fork and replaced the tabs with spaces
> (hopefully) in all affected source files.
> The PR should reflect the updates now.
>
> By the way, is there any source code formatting guideline/template for ODE
> to avoid conflicts in future? :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Michael
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 29. Januar 2018 11:53
> An: dev@ode.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Extension activities
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> I had a brief look and it seems good to me.
> The PR has a lot of tabs in the source, would it be possible to remove
> them and resubmit the PR? I also have updgraded trunk to JAVA 8, there are
> couple of commit for it from the point when your repo forked, can you take
> it up in your repo and the new PR should be a smooth checkin.
>
> Would that be possible?
>
> regards,
> sathwik
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Michael Hahn <mhahn.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sathwik,
> >
> > sure, the forked repo is available at: https://github.com/hahnml/ode
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Michael
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2018 10:34
> > An: dev@ode.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> >
> > Hi Micheal,
> >
> > Thanks for the contribution.
> >
> > Will have a look at it when I get sometime. Can you share your forked
> > repo link?
> >
> > regards,
> > sathwik
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Michael Hahn <mhahn.dev@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sathwik,
> > >
> > > as discussed I created a corresponding PR for porting the extension
> > > activity support (https://github.com/apache/ode/pull/4).
> > > In addition, I added an initial BPEL REST extension activity bundle
> > > as an example together with related test cases in 'bpel-test' project.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your feedback, let me know if something is
> > > missing or has to be adapted :-)
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 06:11
> > > An: dev@ode.apache.org
> > > Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> > >
> > > Micheal,
> > > Am done with porting to trunk. You can start on your PR.
> > >
> > > On Nov 25, 2017 13:17, "Sathwik B P" <sathwik.bp@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > MIchael,
> > > >
> > > > Just hold on to making changes for the trunk, am bringing the
> > > > 1.3.8 commits from the release branch to the trunk. I should
> > > > probably done in about 2-3 days. Major library upgrades are coming
> in.
> > > >
> > > > Just to summarize the changes in the trunk JACOB has been moved
> > > > into a different sub project
> > > > [https://github.com/apache/ode-jacob], the new OModel is here
> > > > https://github.com/apache/ode/tree/master/bpel-nobj
> > .
> > > >
> > > > The compiler has undergone changes. I believe porting of extension
> > > > activities onto this new model will not be straight forward as the
> > > > extension feature was built on the older OModel.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > sathwik
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Sathwik B P
> > > > <sathwik.bp@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Micheal,
> > > >>
> > > >> I am working towards 1.3.8 release. We cannot bring the extension
> > > >> activity feature on 1.3.x branch
> > > >>
> > > >> On Nov 24, 2017 15:46, "Michael Hahn" <mhahn.dev@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Sathwik,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> thanks for the pointers.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I've seen on GitHub that you are currently working on the
> "ode-1.3.x"
> > > >>> branch.
> > > >>> Should I also do the porting based on that branch or better on
> > > >>> the master?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Michael
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > >>> Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik.bp@gmail.com]
> > > >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. November 2017 14:52
> > > >>> An: dev@ode.apache.org
> > > >>> Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi Hahn,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Good to hear about your interest on porting Extension activities
> > > >>> onto the trunk. It only exists in APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental"
> > branch.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I suppose these should be the initial commits from Tammo,
> > > >>> [ODE-159, ODE-160]
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/5ef69232cc6f19cf2818dd1
> > > >>> b110416b959297126
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/ode/commit/1d5fa185a77c944e8d4a708
> > > >>> b451611fa74d5c2dc
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You can just go up the commits if there are more.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> regards,
> > > >>> sathwik
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Michael Hahn
> > > >>> <mhahn.dev@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Hi,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > I'm actually very interested in the support of BPEL extension
> > > >>> > activities in ODE and also willing to help to integrate/build
> > > >>> > the feature :-) Some years ago I was able to successfully
port
> > > >>> > the extension activity support from the
> > "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental"
> > > >>> > branch into an ODE 1.3.4 release.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > So, if someone can give me a pointer where to find the most
> > > >>> > recent version of the extension activity related classes,
I
> > > >>> > can integrate the feature into the current trunk and provide
> > > >>> > the result as a pull request. Else I can also simply go with
> > > >>> > the version in the "APACHE_ODE_2.X-experimental" branch as
a
> > > >>> > starting
> > point.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Regards,
> > > >>> > Michael
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > >>> > Von: Sathwik B P [mailto:sathwik@apache.org]
> > > >>> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017 15:53
> > > >>> > An: dev@ode.apache.org
> > > >>> > Betreff: Re: Extension activities
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Hi Oliver,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > ODE 2.0 branch was an experimental branch and is not
> > > >>> > maintained since a very long time. I will have to revisit
it
> > > >>> > myself, in case it involves changes to the ODE object model,
> > > >>> > then we cannot bring it on any of 1.3.x releases because
of
> > > >>> > chances of breaking binary
> > > >>> compatibilities.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > In order to make new features available, we moved towards
JSON
> > > >>> > based state serialization away from JAVA serialization in
the
> > > >>> > trunk which is in 1.4 release.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Currently, we are seeking new committers, you might want
to
> > > >>> > discuss the feature that you are willing to contribute and
> > > >>> > probably help us
> > > >>> build it.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > regards,
> > > >>> > sathwik
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Oliver Kopp
> > > >>> > <kopp.dev@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > > Hi,
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > In the context of our usage, we rely on BPEL extension
> > > >>> > > activity support within ODE for enabling the invocation
of
> > > >>> > > REST APIs through a corresponding extension bundle.
We
> > > >>> > > therefore ported the extension activity support from
the
> > > >>> > > 2.0-alpha branch (already some years ago and therefore
not
> > > >>> > > up to date with "latest" version on GitHub) into the
current
> > > >>> > > 1.3.7 release build which works. The problem is that
by
> > > >>> > > changing the source code of the official ODE 1.3.7 release,
> > > >>> > > we have to ship our extended version of ODE and take
over
> > > >>> > > responsibilities regarding licenses, etc. Therefore,
it
> > > >>> > > would be really nice if there will be an ODE 1.3.x release
> > > >>> > > with integrated extension activity support, so that
we can
> > > >>> > > use/refer to ODE as it is and as a result treat it as
a
> > > >>> > > ready to use open source middleware such as
> > > Tomcat, we just use within our ecosystem.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Do you see any chance to release a corresponding
> > > >>> > > distribution that contains extension activity support
in the
> near future?
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > In return we are really interested in open sourcing
our
> > > >>> > > BPEL4REST extension bundle so that it can be shipped
as a
> > > >>> > > feature
> > > with ODE!
> > > >>> > > 👨‍🔧
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Cheers,
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Oliver
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message