Hi Pid,
I did just minor reviews to your proposal (maven and svn stuff only)
and I'd really appreciate if you could, before starting discussing
about/modifying something:
* move to proper 'client' package client-only related stuff (it would
much more clear and easier for me add the server API);
* move your custom XML stuff to a dedicated module, since is not
contained in the spec and doesn't match neither with OAuth Discovery
1.0;
* just write 2 lines on the ML about how the interfaces interact with
each other, something simple like I did in a previous email.
Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Simone Tripodi
<simone.tripodi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Pid,
> seen the commit, thanks, just give me the time to digest it :P I have
> proposals for storages, already experienced in the past and part of it
> is already contained in the existing code.
> Chat later,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Pid <pid@pidster.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've committed a proposal for the API spec, it aims to simplify the
>> interaction with the library and focuses on configuration and setup.
>>
>> There are a couple of things to consider in the light of recent
>> discussion, which I don't have proposals for as yet, namely:
>>
>> 1. configurable storage of some sort
>>
>> 2. the possible need to separate client & server factories
>>
>> 3. the server interface methods are not defined
>>
>>
>> Please critique/discuss.
>>
>>
>> p
>>
>>
>
|