Hi Pid, I did just minor reviews to your proposal (maven and svn stuff only) and I'd really appreciate if you could, before starting discussing about/modifying something: * move to proper 'client' package client-only related stuff (it would much more clear and easier for me add the server API); * move your custom XML stuff to a dedicated module, since is not contained in the spec and doesn't match neither with OAuth Discovery 1.0; * just write 2 lines on the ML about how the interfaces interact with each other, something simple like I did in a previous email. Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Pid, > seen the commit, thanks, just give me the time to digest it :P I have > proposals for storages, already experienced in the past and part of it > is already contained in the existing code. > Chat later, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Pid wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've committed a proposal for the API spec, it aims to simplify the >> interaction with the library and focuses on configuration and setup. >> >> There are a couple of things to consider in the light of recent >> discussion, which I don't have proposals for as yet, namely: >> >>  1. configurable storage of some sort >> >>  2. the possible need to separate client & server factories >> >>  3. the server interface methods are not defined >> >> >> Please critique/discuss. >> >> >> p >> >> >