openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mathias Bauer <>
Subject Re: Ooo Hg to Apache Extras (was Re:OOO340 to svn)
Date Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:43:09 GMT
On 28.07.2011 22:43, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>> I am going to operate from the assumption that it is not
>> appropriate to cherry-pick the OOo Apache Extra into the Apache
>> SVN in any manner, although that code base can certainly be used
>> consistent with the license already applied to it.
>> Does anyone recognize a problem with that (i.e., something
>> critical would be unavailable for use by Apache
> Quite. As mentioned before, as yet un-merged CWS like gnumake4 or
> aw080 represent significant amount of work (order of magnitude: man
> years, I'd guess). Mathias suggested to extract patches out of
> those, and have these patches covered by an extended source code
> grant. That should nicely expedite legal review.
> Cheers,
> -- Thorsten

According to advice given on this list, it is enough to have all files 
listed in the software grant statement. For this purpose it would be 
enough to have all new files from all cws (new means: not in OOO340m1) 
listed. I already created such a list and sent it to Andrew Rist for 
further processing.

While we are talking about patches: there might be a way to create 
change sets (history) from the cws hg repos.

First, update the cws repo to the OOO340 trunk repository (pull/merge). 
Then create a list of "outgoing" change sets (against OOO340 trunk) for 
the cws and create patches for all of them by using "hg diff -c" (could 
be done by a script). Then remove all patches representing merge change 
sets (at least those with a suitable comment could be removed by a 
script also), create an svn branch, apply the patches one after another 
and commit them. This will create conflicts or adjustment at times, but 
they will be carried out in svn. As the cws need review before they can 
be intergrated, this work can be a part of the review process and so 
perhaps the additional work is bearable.


View raw message