openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wolf Halton <>
Subject Re: Undue Influence (was RE: Another introduction)
Date Tue, 05 Jul 2011 04:31:35 GMT

I am a commiter but I still don't have my user/pass for svn or the GUI
editing option, so I am one of the 13.  I am apparently not aware of how to
signal my interest in being on the PPMC.  What is a TLA?  Why is it bad to
have it?

Wolf Halton

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <
> wrote:

> For the record, as of yesterday, July 3, there are 50 committers on the
> Apache project.  34 of those are non-mentor members of the
> PPMC.  Another 13 committers apparently don't know that they are invited to
> be on the PPMC and the simple step required to activate that membership.
>  (One eligible committer has declined to serve on the PPMC.  That's a free
> choice.)
> You can find all of the current committers on the list here:
> <>
> As far as I can tell, among the current committers, there are only four
> individuals with a TLA in their company name.  It is a big company, and I
> don't know all of them.
> We have further potential for committers and PPMC members among the 26
> listed as Initial Committers who are yet to submit an iCLA.  Some may also
> be affiliated with TLA Corporation, though I don't spot any.
> There are also those ooo-dev contributors who will, as the strength of
> their contribution becomes evident, are invited to become committers and/or
> serve on the PPMC.  Some of those may well be affiliated with TLA
> Corporation.
>  - Dennis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [] On Behalf Of Rob Weir
> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 19:37
> To:
> Subject: Re: Another introduction
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Graham Lauder <>
> wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > There was no error in the question, decisions made at IBM, whether
> > policy on OSS, Developer time allowance, code release to the core, work
> > on elements that are only useful in Symphony.... these are corporate
> > decisions that can affect the project.
> >
> Actually, none of this can affect the project unless the project
> accepts the work we do.  We have a PPMC of what?  50?  60? 70 members?
>  And how many IBM employees on it?  Maybe 6?  7? 8?  All we can do is
> offer contributions.  Remember, even a project Committer does not have
> absolute ability to make changes at whim.  Changes are reviewed and
> can be rejected by other Committers.
> If you are saying that IBM engineers collectively have the ability to
> make contributions that could be accepted by the project and by being
> accepted would affect the project, then I thank you for the
> compliment.  But I don't see a problem here.  Honestly, we're getting
> pretty equal criticism from people suggesting we're not going to
> contribute enough as there are people concerned that we're going to
> contribute too much.
> [ ... ]

This Apt Has Super Cow Powers -

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message