openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <>
Subject Re: Fundraising
Date Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:10:52 GMT
Am 08/14/2011 08:01 AM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
> Am 14.08.11 03:58, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Eike Rathke<> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>> On Saturday, 2011-08-13 10:51:57 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>> Donations went to Team, e.V, or to SPI (for US
>>>> donations). I'm assuming that Oracle does not control either of these
>>>> accounts. I'm assuming as well that Apache and the PPMC has no
>>>> control over these accounts.
>>> For Team OOo that's correct. For SPI that's presumably correct as well.
>>>> Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think an Apache
>>>> project can have a private fund, or solicit donations for a 3rd party
>>>> one.
>>> Why not?
>> I've formed a US-based non-profit corporation before, so I know some
>> of the concerns. To preserve tax-exempt status, as well as to comply
>> with fund raising regulations, you need to be very careful how
>> donations are solicited and how they are spent. There is a lot of
>> paperwork and a lot of details. I have no experience with doing this
>> internationally, but that certainly increases the complexity. It is
>> very reasonable for Apache not to assume the risks to their non-profit
>> status that would come if they allowed every poding or even project to
>> do its own fund raising.
> I assume that a donnation to the ASF is only tax-free in the US. Every
> Country has here there oven criteria. That's the reason why Wikipedia
> has NGO's in each Country. It means, donnation to the ASF will not be
> Tax-Free in Switzerland.
>>>> Maybe have it point to here instead:
>>> I think a donation to Apache in general is different from a donation
>>> specifically to the AOOo project. I didn't see a "designated use" field
>>> in the PayPal form.
>> Correct. Projects are not independent legal entities. The legal
>> entity is the Apache Software Foundation. But the website does say,
>> "If you have a specific target or project that you wish to directly
>> support, please contact us and we will do our best to satisfy your
>> wishes". But that is different than saying that a project has a fund
>> under their control.
> Yes, and that's exactly the problem why no one is willing to give money.
> Peopel like to know where where there money go,

I doubt that. When it's clear that the money cannot go directly to the 
AOO project, then it's for the entire ASF *including* AOO.

The problem of giving money (from the average human) is the fact that 
you have a) less in your wallet, b) you don't see or get a short-term 
effect; like a bugfix or a new release with your preferred language.

> else they can affort a Lisence of MS Office.

This is not true and pure rant.


>>>> Higher level question is this: is there any particular reason that we
>>>> think AOOo has fundraising needs that are not covered by Apache's
>>>> fundraising? Apache provides the servers, the domain registrations,
>>>> they have conferences which we are welcome to attend, they have a
>>>> press office, etc.
>>> Team OOo paid bursaries for individuals that went to OOoCons and
>>> Hackfest, paid hardware for buildbots and pootle servers, paid students
>>> for the OOo internship. Do you think that Apache will cover those
>>> expenses?
>> Apache provides the hardware. They also have travel assistance for
>> ApacheCon. It is probably premature to talk about the next OOoCon.
>> I'm not aware of any internship sponsorship, but Apache does
>> participate in GSoC:
>>> Eike

View raw message