openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: [Discussion] dev@openoffice.org
Date Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:33:37 GMT
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've 
write access) please let me know.

Marcus



Am 08/22/2011 11:10 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
>
> On 08/21/2011 03:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> I've updated the text on "http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html"
>> (with borrowed text from Mathias).
>>
>> Marcus
>
> That should help a bit I think! :)
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 08/19/2011 07:57 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>> Am 08/19/2011 07:29 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.mail@wtnet.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Am 08/19/2011 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>> So why wouldn't we want to shut down that list?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you asking when you want to do it anyway? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Clearly I have my own opinion on this. But I'd like to understand the
>>>> counter-argument, if there is one.
>>>
>>> OK, didn't knew this.
>>>
>>>>>> Real posts at dev@openoffice.org are infrequent and are not getting
>>>>>> responded to. But ooo-dev is clearly where the thriving dev
>>>>>> discussion is occurring.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aren't these good reasons to consolidate the dev discussion in one
>>>>>> place? Is there any advantage to have it be fragmented across two
>>>>>> lists, especially if one list is mainly getting spam?
>>>>>
>>>>> If so, it would be the same reason to shutdown also other mailing
>>>>> lists. So,
>>>>> we could do it will all.
>>>>
>>>> I think the dev list is special, because we have an active Apache list
>>>> that has the identical purpose. The same is not true for many other
>>>> OO.org lists.
>>>
>>> There is nothing special. For OOo we had hundreds of ML to keep the
>>> traffic in the right channels.
>>>
>>> Her at AOO we have only one. So all traffic (and it's more than just dev
>>> related) into 1 ML.
>>>
>>> For me there is no real difference.
>>>
>>>>> As Mathias said, the shutdown will happen anyway. No need to force it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We are currently missing opportunities when new volunteers post to the
>>>> other list and do not get a response. Also, existing subscribers to
>>>> the dev@openoffice.org list are missing out on the discussions we are
>>>> having regarding things like reorganizing the source repository, etc.
>>>>
>>>> The goal should be to encourage existing subscribers to move over to
>>>
>>> You have told this already. Then just write a note to dev@ooo; if
>>> Mathias hasn't done it already. ;-)
>>>
>>>> ooo-dev. There are several ways of doing this. An announcement, like
>>>> Matthias sent, is a good thing. Maybe also update this page:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html
>>>>
>>>> For lists that have been migrated, put instructions there on how to
>>>> subscribe to the Apache list.
>>>
>>> Good point, let me see if I can do something. But to have a real success
>>> we need to make this change everywhere. And IMHO this is not possible;
>>> or at least it's a not maintainable effort.
>>>
>>>> If we delay shutting down the list until a later point, that is fine
>>>> with me. I just wanted to see if anyone thought there was a reason to
>>>> preserve the list longer-term.
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> Marcus

Mime
View raw message