openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <apa...@robweir.com>
Subject Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org? (was re:OpenOffice.org branding)
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2011 02:05:52 GMT
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:24 PM, TerryE <ooo@ellisons.org.uk> wrote:
> On 02/08/11 23:28, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> With the wiki, if we really want to allow anyone to have write access
>> to it, then we really need to be committed to fight the weeds, which
>> in the case of wikis would be spam, low quality content, edit wars,
>> etc.  If we can re-establish the community participation level the way
>> it was a year ago, then great.  It would have a chance of success.
>> But right now I see almost no activity on the wiki.  35,000 user
>> accounts, but no users.  If this doesn't change, the weeds will surely
>> win.
>
> [terrye@doc logs]$ ls -hl
>
> total 112635922
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Jan 12  2011 access.20110106.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.2G Jan 19  2011 access.20110113.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.2G Jan 26  2011 access.20110120.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.2G Feb  2  2011 access.20110127.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.2G Feb  9 23:59 access.20110203.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Feb 16 23:59 access.20110210.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Feb 23 23:59 access.20110217.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Mar  2 23:59 access.20110224.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Mar  9 23:59 access.20110303.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.0G Mar 16 23:59 access.20110310.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.0G Mar 23 23:59 access.20110317.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.0G Mar 30 23:59 access.20110324.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.9G Apr  6 23:59 access.20110331.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.9G Apr 13 23:59 access.20110407.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.8G Apr 20 23:59 access.20110414.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.6G Apr 27 23:59 access.20110421.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.8G May  4 23:59 access.20110428.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.8G May 11 23:59 access.20110505.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.7G May 18 23:59 access.20110512.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.6G May 25 23:59 access.20110519.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.6G Jun  1 23:59 access.20110526.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.5G Jun  8 23:59 access.20110602.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.5G Jun 15 23:59 access.20110609.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.6G Jun 22 23:59 access.20110616.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.4G Jun 29 23:59 access.20110623.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.3G Jul  6 23:59 access.20110630.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.4G Jul 13 23:59 access.20110707.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.3G Jul 20 23:59 access.20110714.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.4G Jul 27 23:59 access.20110721.log
>
> -rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.1G Aug  3 03:14 access.20110728.log
>
> We've discussed the update access reasons and issues previously.   As you
> can see from the Apache logs, the read volumes are still pretty high though
> they have fallen off by almost a factor of two since the Apache
> announcement.  Sorry, but I can't give you proper transaction volumes.
>  Clayton had  o:rw access, not me.
>

No need to apologize.  Read volumes are pretty much irrelevant when
discussing a policy for editing.  Or are you suggesting that this is
related to caching policy?  If so, that is a reasonable point.  With
only 5 people editing, with a very low rate of changes, and many
people reading, caching should be very effective, at least on the most
frequently-read pages.

> Terry
>

Mime
View raw message