openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shane Curcuru <>
Subject Re: Foundation blog posting on Apache OOo
Date Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:52:51 GMT
On 10/17/2011 1:58 PM, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
> Am 14.10.2011 18:22, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Whereas it is in the self-interest of those entities
> Hmm, I think it's not that easy. We see Team (as the
> legal entity behind the old Community Council) still in the
> repsonsibilty of an uncredible amount of users which gave their support
> in the last decade to (the old one).
> And it was not Team acting so that we going to have two
> forks of the old codebase in the future.
> We'd look foward to support collaboration and to re-unify forces, so
> that we come to a stronger product and project than we ever had, but I
> don't think that it helps to ignore history of completly,
> Martin (Team e.V.)

That's great news - I'm sure with your experience the Apache OpenOffice 
PPMC will be very glad to see you participating on the mailing lists 
here and helping to get a new release out for the podling.  8-)

I understand that this is a difficult situation for a large number of 
people and organizations.  The best way forward here at Apache is to 
work with this PPMC on figuring out the new way forward with a future 
Apache OpenOffice product that can make use of as much of the great code 
and goodwill that the previous project created as 
possible - both so we can support the end-users looking for a 
high-quality product, and so we can support other developers wishing to 
use our permissively-licensed code.

Two key factors for moving forward here at Apache include:

- Working in the Apache Way, on our public mailing lists.  I'll repeat 
an old phrase that is critical to understanding how we work:

   "If it didn't happen on the mailing list, it didn't happen."

- Working with the PPMC - and other relevant organizations - to respect 
everyone's trademarks.  That includes the "" registered 
trademark and logo which now belong to the ASF here in the USand other 
countries, as well as the many other closely related trademarks used by 
third parties in various countries.

- Shane

View raw message