From ooo-dev-return-20294-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Jun 4 08:12:07 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52FE795D8 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55306 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2012 08:12:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55237 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2012 08:12:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55216 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2012 08:12:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:12:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rgaloppini@geek.net designates 74.125.149.73 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.149.73] (HELO na3sys009aog104.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:11:59 +0000 Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob104.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT8xtuns+4dkppdjBV0fngRwGnDynec3i@postini.com; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:11:38 PDT Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so6730976pbb.40 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:11:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=A1ivH8fmwuXWacUxrNB3HqR5bgu+T8/Oayhw4W3MwlQ=; b=EBd+1Ac9/Uq9iDvXv0/kOa9kTmXG/pIKIo1oB34q14LzXqEwsJunaZucp+UFsOygV+ qbfjUHbCt77S533DGNSxlewyl2epuWYyeauOQny77xvEAQzO5L79FhcXu91+69OP8t3m yaI7XBcs/XlxfgTDPLIf3VuP/3wbMOy6WChHnU8tfdhe0rdSSqUH1LWK/G950Wfhsx0b BmAOnOcxsWsGdC/SwIu3YyqUcI2bdf85lcXPtKYhr2FZGETUz9twTcAKi1Dpb29s/7X4 noNFYGXHOzjY9M0LTA7tCqhJ1G2ggktjk8snN0tpGtXokBl1M2ef2MlQ7mMW98f1d54p CKTg== Received: by 10.68.226.73 with SMTP id rq9mr36486815pbc.145.1338797497655; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:11:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.226.73 with SMTP id rq9mr36486787pbc.145.1338797497533; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.26.232 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 01:11:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FCC6B81.9030207@googlemail.com> References: <4FB38E67.7040406@googlemail.com> <4FBB92F2.4090500@googlemail.com> <4FC5F9EB.10102@googlemail.com> <4FC72E03.2010206@googlemail.com> <4FC88A35.90901@googlemail.com> <4FCC6B81.9030207@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:11:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal a OOo 3.3 update service From: Roberto Galoppini To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl29jgKm09tT07pXtmKk3R6J/B7oBqk2JKKQpfI5MnvorFmZAV1sxFqmcMMaQfe09xqJgNamSbbrBtXPHp9shDwqws5Jg== On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > > On 02.06.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann< >> orwittmann@googlemail.com> =A0wrote: >> >>> [snip] >>> >>> >>> =A0One other question: =A0does this take care of OOo 3.2 upgrades as we= ll? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Not yet planned nor tested, but I assume that the XML document only nee= ds >>> minor adjustments. >>> OOo 3.2 has the UpdateURL >>> http://update34.services.**openoffice.org/. >>> .. >>> OOo 3.2.1 has the Update URL >>> http://update35.services.**openoffice.org/. >>> .. >>> >>> But once the update service is working for OOo 3.3, we can easily do th= e >>> same for OOo 3.2 and OOo 3.2.1 (and even former versions). >> >> >> >> Oliver, =A0don't go any further back than maybe 3.1. The 3.0 update URL = is >> the one that uses POST instead of GET, and creates mayhem! >> >> This is update30.... >> >> DO NOT redirect this one. I don't know about some of the others. >> >> We should probably be fie with update34, update 35. >> > > My personal opinion is that an update service for OOo 3.3, OOo 3.2.1 and = OOo > 3.2 is enough to reach our user base. May be also for OOo 3.1.1 and OOo 3= .1, > if we see a high number of users on OOo 3.2.1 and OOo 3.2. > >> >> Everything else seems great! >> >> > > Thanks. > Let see what happens, when we start tomorrow with the "Italian OOo 3.3 > update service". Tomorrow at which time? Roberto > > Best regards, Oliver. --=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It= =20 may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the=20 intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination,=20 distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly=20 prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately= =20 notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any= =20 attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.