On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > > On 02.06.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann< >> orwittmann@googlemail.com>  wrote: >> >>> [snip] >>> >>> >>>  One other question:  does this take care of OOo 3.2 upgrades as well? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Not yet planned nor tested, but I assume that the XML document only needs >>> minor adjustments. >>> OOo 3.2 has the UpdateURL >>> http://update34.services.**openoffice.org/. >>> .. >>> OOo 3.2.1 has the Update URL >>> http://update35.services.**openoffice.org/. >>> .. >>> >>> But once the update service is working for OOo 3.3, we can easily do the >>> same for OOo 3.2 and OOo 3.2.1 (and even former versions). >> >> >> >> Oliver,  don't go any further back than maybe 3.1. The 3.0 update URL is >> the one that uses POST instead of GET, and creates mayhem! >> >> This is update30.... >> >> DO NOT redirect this one. I don't know about some of the others. >> >> We should probably be fie with update34, update 35. >> > > My personal opinion is that an update service for OOo 3.3, OOo 3.2.1 and OOo > 3.2 is enough to reach our user base. May be also for OOo 3.1.1 and OOo 3.1, > if we see a high number of users on OOo 3.2.1 and OOo 3.2. > >> >> Everything else seems great! >> >> > > Thanks. > Let see what happens, when we start tomorrow with the "Italian OOo 3.3 > update service". Tomorrow at which time? Roberto > > Best regards, Oliver. -- ==== This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.