openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Risto Jääskeläinen <>
Subject Re: Crazy idea: Use Google to translate website
Date Mon, 02 Jul 2012 06:22:29 GMT

Why not?
I have used Google tranlator as a word book.  Translation to Finnish is not nice languge but
words are mostly OK. So I find normally more easy to write whole sentence manually than try
to fix proposals. In some other languges structure is more like in English and I suppose threre
is more to win for example on documentation.

In future computer translations are better than today. So it is a resource allocation issue


Raphael Bircher [] kirjoitti: 
> Hi Rob
> I don't think this is a good idea. The translation is always not good,
> and many Computer related topics are nearly unreadable. As we see, there
> is not a load interests in translating websites or documentation as part
> of the official project. I would like to see that we puche thrid party
> page for documentation usw. Remember Apache is about development, it's
> designed for development. I beleve good trid party website are much
> better than a Google translated website, or not maintained NL websites.
> Greetings Raphael
> Am 02.07.12 01:55, schrieb Rob Weir:
> > We've probably all seen the Google Translate service at:
> >
> >
> > And many of us have probably seen this integrated into websites, so a
> > reader can select a translation language from a menu on the page.
> >
> > The machine-generated translations are variable.  Sometimes they are
> > incomprehensible.  And sometimes the translations are pretty good.
> > But they are never as good as an expert human translation.
> >
> > If you hover your mouse over a Google Translate translation, it offers
> > an option, "contribute a better translation".   That, combined with
> > the ability to easily switch back to the original page, allows Google
> > to refine their translations.  So you can fix errors in the machine
> > translation.  Until now this has all been out of the website owner's
> > control.
> >
> > According to this blog post [1] Google is now enabling the suggested
> > translations to go back to the website owner for review and approval.
> > They've also added site-specific glossary support as well as the
> > ability to support multiple translation editors per account (in
> > addition to the unbounded number of readers who can suggest
> > translations).
> >
> > So this is getting interesting.
> >
> > Is this worth enabling for either the podling website or the
> > website?
> >
> > Note that this does mean we stop doing NL pages.  But this does allow
> > us to quickly expand the scope of our translations, both in supported
> > languages as well as translated pages.  It also lowers the barrier to
> > entry for contributors who want to improve the machine generated
> > translations.
> >
> >
> > [1]

View raw message