openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From J├╝rgen Schmidt <>
Subject Re: Apache OpenOffice in Fedora 19?
Date Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:13:59 GMT
On 2/7/13 8:59 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> But I would have trademark concerns if a statement like this installed
>> anything but OpenOffice:
>> sudo yum install
> It doesn't. But indeed the alias has been discussed and I
> hope we can get it reassigned or dropped without invoking trademarks.
> Anyway, it is not one of the technically problematic aliases but just a
> convenience alias, so it can be addressed after we have packages ready.

We should argue that the aliases came from OpenOffice and that they were
hijacked if you want by LibreOffice. They even used the package name in
the past to install LibreOffice and not OpenOffice. We tolerated it
because we had no updated version in place with the latest security
fixes. But that's it and the game changed, we have a current version and
will provide future versions.

And again changing soffice means much more work and I really don't see
why we should change it because they belong to OpenOffice.

Some magic UNO bootstrap code used by UNO client applications used the
soffice alias for example. Changing it would break potential client

The other aliases like oowriter are obvious where they come from, why
should we change them?

It is important to come back in distros but we should not easy give up
what belongs to OpenOffice.


View raw message