openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Fisher <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1441659 - /openoffice/site/trunk/templates/sidenav.mdtext
Date Sat, 02 Feb 2013 14:07:50 GMT
Two hours with a wrong (R) if it is wrong won't invalidate anything. There is room for a mistake.
Please just disagree and let me be responsible enough to make an adjustment.

If I had not responded in a few hours then what you did is ok. My point is about letting time

You do a lot for OpenOffice and that is great!

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 2, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Rob Weir <> wrote:

> On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Tim Williams <> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Rob Weir <> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Dave Fisher <> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Rob Weir <> wrote:
>>>>>> -1
>>>>> I've reverted that commit.  Getting this wrong could have serious
>>>>> repercussions, so let's make sure we get it right.
>>>> Not exactly. You left the link which was the main thing I wanted to add!
A full revert would have been anti-social. The sociable thing is to ask the committer to do
it. It's their commit and we are all in this together. OK.
>>> IMHO, the sociable thing is not to feel such exclusive ownership over
>>> one's commit that one would be offended if someone else reverted it
>>> because they thought it was harmful.  We are all in this together,
>>> right?
>> Nope.  It's universally uncool to revert someone else's commit.  You
>> raised the -1, let *them* do the revert, after you've provided
>> convincing rationale to the community...
> Then count me uncool then. I did it and I'd do it again in similar
> circumstances.  It is easier to apologize to David later If I'm wrong
> then for us to have the trademark legally invalidated if I was right
> and did not act quickly.
> -Rob
>> --tim

View raw message