openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jürgen Schmidt <>
Subject Re: [CODE][PROPOSAL]: AOO 4.0 getting rid of the 3 layer office, part 1
Date Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:46:26 GMT
On 3/27/13 3:23 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:12:39AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Different opinions came up and we had some discussion and you
>> pointed out that you can live with feedback. Where is exactly
>> your problem now?
> I don't have any problem at all.
>> I don't think that it will help us if we react this way.
> I am not reacting. Please don't turn this into a circus like the
> one with the 0^0.
>> Really nobody wanted that you revert anything here.
> I am no native English speaker, but for the content, and the tone,
> of Andre mails, I understood he wanted his extension back:
>> I don't see why this change should be a good thing.
>> I was hoping that I would find the time in the future to fix
>> this
>> Including the pre-bundled extensions into the core is a
>> workaround not a fix.
>> We are still able (well until your changes) to release the
>> presenter console under Apache license
>> I still don' t see the benefit of the change.
>> [...] This is something that I have used several times in the
>> past and always was very glad that I had it.
> And he got it back (together with the Presentation Minimizer, as
> it makes no sense to have one pre-registered extension and the
> other integrated).
> Again, I don't have any problem at all, nor then, nor now :)

Just a short question before I lose it out of focus, do you plan to
revert your revert? Or can/should we revert it? I really think it was
a misunderstanding and nothing else.


> Regards

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message