openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claudio Filho <filh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [CODE][PROPOSAL]: AOO 4.0 getting rid of the 3 layer office, part 1
Date Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:54:25 GMT
Err...

Sorry but... the extentions cited by Ariel will be integrated in the source
as "code" and not as "extension"? In other words, will be part of core?

As he explained, make sense for me to merge this functions in the code in
the same way of Solver was in the past.

Sorry by my newbie understanding about the question. I am studing the
requeriment to build into debian way, getting many "problems" to bring the
code to be "debianized", breaking in some parts (at this moment in
pdfimport module) and to know more about this question can help.

And thanks by share the final of this point.

Bests,
Claudio



2013/4/3 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischmidt@gmail.com>

> On 3/27/13 3:23 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:12:39AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> Different opinions came up and we had some discussion and you
> >> pointed out that you can live with feedback. Where is exactly
> >> your problem now?
> >
> > I don't have any problem at all.
> >
> >> I don't think that it will help us if we react this way.
> >
> > I am not reacting. Please don't turn this into a circus like the
> > one with the 0^0.
> >
> >> Really nobody wanted that you revert anything here.
> >
> > I am no native English speaker, but for the content, and the tone,
> > of Andre mails, I understood he wanted his extension back:
> >
> >> I don't see why this change should be a good thing.
> >
> >> I was hoping that I would find the time in the future to fix
> >> this
> >
> >> Including the pre-bundled extensions into the core is a
> >> workaround not a fix.
> >
> >> We are still able (well until your changes) to release the
> >> presenter console under Apache license
> >
> >> I still don' t see the benefit of the change.
> >
> >> [...] This is something that I have used several times in the
> >> past and always was very glad that I had it.
> >
> > And he got it back (together with the Presentation Minimizer, as
> > it makes no sense to have one pre-registered extension and the
> > other integrated).
> >
> > Again, I don't have any problem at all, nor then, nor now :)
>
> Just a short question before I lose it out of focus, do you plan to
> revert your revert? Or can/should we revert it? I really think it was
> a misunderstanding and nothing else.
>
> Juergen
>
>
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message