openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: Mac release
Date Thu, 18 Jul 2013 20:43:16 GMT
Am 07/18/2013 05:23 PM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
> On 17.07.2013 22:50, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 07/15/2013 07:06 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>> Am 07/15/2013 06:57 PM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>>>> On 15.07.2013 18:08, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.mail@wtnet.de>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 07/15/2013 10:18 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Issue 122732 [1]reminded me of the problem on Mac where the system
>>>>>>> complains that the AOO installation packaged does not come from
the
>>>>>>> Apple app store. As Ariel pointed out, this is covered in the
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> notes for AOO 3.4.0 and 3.4.1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not sure that that many users would find the note in the
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> notes, follow the link to the solution and fix it.
>>>>>>> I wonder if it would be a good idea to explain this at a more
>>>>>>> visible
>>>>>>> place, like the download button for the Mac version. Does anybody
>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>> if that is possible?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Andre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122732<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122732>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is possible. However I don't like to have an exception for
>>>>>> users of
>>>>>> platform X. This would make the "index.html" more unreadable than
>>>>>> it is
>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Therefore I've created a general text and link to the release
>>>>>> notes (of
>>>>>> course, it's still intermediate):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Directly in the main green box.
>>>>>> 2) In a second sub-green box.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please have a look and tell what you think. IMHO 1) is better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) is better.
>>>>
>>>> I like 1 better, too. But it still looks too prominent. We don't
>>>> want to
>>>> scare our users (when only a minority will run into this problem).
>>>> Maybe
>>>> an explanation in the release notes is enough.
>>>
>>> I've decreased the font size a bit. And remember only 1) or 2) will
>>> survive at the end. Currently it's duplicated which maybe supports the
>>> too prominent look & feel.
>>
>> @Andre, all:
>> What do you think: Keep or leave? I just need to know this how to
>> handle the final webpage.
>
> Better leave it out.

OK, it's gone from the test webpage.

Marcus



>>>>> maybe change wording to "Click here for known installation issues"
>>>>>
>>>>> I know this is going to the Release Notes page...but maybe we should
>>>>> focus
>>>>> on highlighting "installation".
>>>>>
>>>>> I just edited Release Notes to duplicate the Mac OS X info in the
>>>>> Upgrading/Installing section. Left it in Known Issues as well.
>>>>
>>>> Great thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message