openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: Release communications -- plans
Date Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:42:30 GMT
Am 07/19/2013 01:51 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 07/19/2013 08:03 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> 1) I recall seeing that there was a "static" version available for each
>>> page, which was the recommended one for publishing links (and had a URL
>>> ending in .html). I can't see it now. What is the link we should
>>> publish?
>> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/4.0.0.html
>
> Sorry, I meant the static version of the cwiki page. The cwiki pages

OK, I didn't know about that.

> exist in two versions, the "live" one and a static one that is
> automatically generated (and, possibly, handles the traffic better?). In
> the meantime I found it: the static version of
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes
> is
> https://cwiki.apache.org/OOOUSERS/aoo-40-release-notes.html
> but the former actually looks nicer...

Interesting :-)

> As for the www.openoffice.org page, if I get it right we won't be
> copying the release notes to the website right now: we will use the
> cwiki version at release time.
>
>>> 2) May we get rid of the "Upgraded to 3.5.17. Upgrade to 5.1 delayed."
>>> notice in the page header? ...
>> Does someone from our project has inserted the hint? I thought it was an
>> Infra topic.
>
> Yes, this was added by Infra when they upgraded Cwiki. The static
> version does not display it.

Then we have our link. :-)

Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message