openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From J├╝rgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [BUGZILLA] proposal for new entry in field Target Milestone
Date Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:23:56 GMT
On 3/6/14 9:20 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 05.03.2014 22:46, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 03/05/2014 05:23 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
>>>> <orwittmann@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I
>>>>> would
>>>>> like to propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'.
>>>>> Something
>>>>> like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which won't
>>>>> be part
>>>>> of the AOO 4.1.0 release, but be part of the next following one. Once
>>>>> we had
>>>>> agreed on the version number for this release this new entry shall be
>>>>> renamed accordingly.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would it make sense to have two, like:
>>>>
>>>> AOO.next.micro
>>>> AOO.next.minor
>>>>
>>>> That would map to things targeted for 4.1.1 (work done in the branch)
>>>> versus 4.2.0 (work done in the trunk).
>>>>
>>>
>>> It might make sense, but I think in this case we can name
>>> 'AOO.next.micro' directly '4.1.1' (we also know, what the next micro
>>> release will be) and it should be introduced right after our 4.1.0
>>> release, when a corresponding issue comes to life.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I also think that we can name the things directly.
>>
>> For issues that should be fixed/resolved in the mid-term future, we can
>> use the already existing "AOO Later".
>>
> 
> strong -1 from my side for using 'AOO Later'.
> my arguments are:
> - There are already more than 1800 issue having this 'Target Milestone'.
> - 'AOO Later' sounds like 'never' - just my experience from former days
> when we had 'OOo Later' as 'Target Milestone'.

I agree "AOO Later" is not the best choice, "AOO next" sounds much more
positive and if we agree on using it only for issues where somebody is
committed to fix it, it becomes much more useful.

Juergen


> 
> Best regards, Oliver.
> 
>> And if there is no idea how and when to fix it, then simply don#t set
>> any target version.
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>>> BTW, is it possible to rename an existing entry of 'Target Milestone' as
>>> I had propose above?
>>>
>>> Just my 2 cents.
>>>
>>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>>
>>>> -Rob
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards, Oliver.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message