openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yuzhen Fan <fanyuz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC
Date Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:49:25 GMT
Hi Pedro,

Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the
same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks!


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pedlino@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update
> patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would
> never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers!
>
> I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing
> 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US.
>
> Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small
> quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two
> startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder.
>
> In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the
> 4.1.0.
>
> I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users.
>
> I can create a bugzilla report if necessary.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fanyuzhen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on
> en_US.
> >
> > From testing perspective:
> > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing
> > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting.
> > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios
> > on all language packages
> > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1)
> > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <steve.yin.aoo@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > No problem found.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <steve.yin.aoo@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <
> jogischmidt@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the
vote
> will
> > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the
install
> > > >> packages
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for
future
> > > patches
> > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2
to an
> 4.3.
> > > The
> > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we
have
> > overseen a
> > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for
now and
> > have
> > > to
> > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more
careful.
> > They
> > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for
a
> potential
> > > 4.2
> > > >> or
> > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't
be
> > > >> installed
> > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want
for now
> > ;-)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further
> confusion.
> > > Stay
> > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy
> > testing
> > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday.
> > > >>
> > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the
> > > >> same values as before.
> > > >>
> > > >> Juergen
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Juergen
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Juergen
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Juergen
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> >>>> Hi,
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!!
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming
AOO 4.1
> > > >> release.
> > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that
we had to fix
> > some
> > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like
to propose a
> > > >> first RC
> > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch.
We spend a
> lot
> > of
> > > >> time
> > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing.
The
> MacOS
> > > and
> > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux
upload is
> > > still
> > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience
and
> > the
> > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and
tasks going
> > into
> > > >> this
> > > >> >>>> release can be found under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html
> > .
> > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification
of the
> > fixed
> > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation
> > updates/fixes
> > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and
for the
> > > languages
> > > >> we
> > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended
for
> > private
> > > >> use
> > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release.
It's
> the
> > > >> first
> > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and
we have to
> > test
> > > >> the
> > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full
install sets
> > are
> > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release
patches in
> the
> > > >> future
> > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have
upgraded
> AOO
> > > >> 4.0.1
> > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO
4.1 ;-)
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and
let it run
> > until
> > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate
the bits
> > > >> careful.
> > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers
> > because
> > > >> they
> > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and
we should
> take
> > > into
> > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project
able to
> fix
> > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers
> and
> > on
> > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users.
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Juergen
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Yin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Steve Yin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Yu Zhen
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Yu Zhen

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message