openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de>
Subject Re: Short-term priorities for OpenOffice
Date Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:04:59 GMT
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pescetti@apache.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 9:26 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Short-term priorities for OpenOffice
> 
> Marcus wrote:
> > Am 01/24/2015 06:56 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> >> 4) External reorganization: decide how we see OpenOffice 
> as part of a
> >> larger ecosystem, so what we can do in terms of 
> collaboration with other
> >> projects that are from Apache or from outside Apache.
> > For me this is no thing that can be solved short-term. 
> Furthermore, we
> > should first solve the internal things to be able/ready to 
> think about
> > external affairs.
> 
> I'll clarify it once again. My proposal means exactly that 
> people do not 
> bring up these issues while we discuss the previous ones in 
> the list, to 
> avoid long discussions that ultimately block the project.
> 
> > It's a partly "yes". ;-)
> > My order would be #1, #2, #3, #5 (however some can/should be done in
> > parallel) and when that all is done #4.
> 
> Yes, #5 (release) would be discussed in parallel. This is not 
> an issue. 
> The issue is if this becomes a blocker. I want everybody to be clear 
> that if we have consensus here we won't be able to accept objections 
> like "Before electing a new Chair we must release OpenOffice 4.1.2".
> 
> Taking into account the different opinions expressed so far, I'm now 
> seeing a certain agreement on:
> 1) Election a new PMC Chair ...
> 2) Internal reorganization: people say what they are going to do to 
> drive the project forward ...
> Later) Re-alignment between PMC and active community ...
> Later) External reorganization: decide how we see OpenOffice 
> as part of 
> a larger ecosystem ...
> Later) Release OpenOffice 4.1.2 ...
> 
> The "Later" items need not be done in this order. What 
> matters is that 
> nobody should push their completion as priorities over #1 and #2.
> 
> Can we agree on this simplified version, so that we can take 
> the first 
> steps?

OK for me

Note:
I'm not a PMC member (I mention this because you wrote: "I'm asking for consensus, Especially
from PMC members ...")


Greetings,
Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message