openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Max Merbald <>
Subject Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia
Date Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:31:13 GMT
According to the links on that page it's him.

Am 16.09.2015 um 19:58 schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts:
>> On 16 Sep 15, at 13:56, Rob Weir <> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:52 PM, John D'Orazio
>> <> wrote:
>>> Interestingly mr. David Gerard IS a moderator on Wikipedia it seems. He
>>> still has to abide by the rules though. And there is quite a bit of
>>> discussion on the talk page, where some users have opted to split the
>>> "Apache OpenOffice" project onto its own page as a completely separate
>>> derivative project. All that is needed is to chime in on the article talk
>>> page citing references to legal info about being officially
>>> in the hands of the Apache Software Foundation. If there is evidence of
>>> that (which seems obvious to me, I'm a newcomer but I go to the webpage and
>>> I see Apache OpenOffice on the webpage), it just needs to be
>>> cited on the talk page to back any kind of edits to the article that
>>> reflect that. Seems that the article has already been split and "Apache
>>> OpenOffice" has it's own wikipedia article (
>>>, I wouldn't make a big
>>> deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions
>>> about Apache not having legal rights to the project (hence
>>> the corrections to the infobox information).
>>> I don't know all of the technicalities, so the edits I just made might not
>>> be precise, for example which release was the first release to have the
>>> Apache license?
>> Is this the same David Gerard discussed here?
> Oh, I hope so!
> Louis
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message