openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?
Date Thu, 05 May 2016 17:51:01 GMT
Windows XP SP3 32-bit on a VirtualBox instance on FreeBSD, underlying
filesystem is ZFS which does cause I/O slowdown, but not enough to explain
this.

Can't remember what compiler I installed; there are Windows SDK 7 and
Visual Studio 9 directories.

SDK_PATH="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0"
./configure --with-frame-home="$SDK_PATH" --with-psdk-home="$SDK_PATH"
--with-midl-path="$SDK_PATH/bin"
--with-ant-home="/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.6" --with-dmake-url="
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2"
--with-epm-url="http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz"
--enable-pch --disable-atl --disable-activex --without-junit
--with-cl-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC"
--with-csc-path="/cygdrive/c/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5"
--with-jdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Java/jdk1.7.0" --disable-directx
--with-package-format="installed" --enable-wiki-publisher

I am currently thinking we will gain more from porting to Java, than trying
to maintain a build system for the buggy, leaky, complex, crash-prone,
insecure languages that are C/C++.

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Damjan Jovanovic <damjan@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately I discovered a major problem with the
> > gbuild-reintegration branch: on Windows, the build time of trunk is
> > about 3-4 hours, but it's over 12 hours to build gbuild-reintegration
> > :-(. I don't have time to investigate soon, nor do I know where to
> > even begin...
> >
>
> ​Hi Damjan, and thanks for this update even it is disappointing.
>
> Could you share what the specifics are for the Windows platform you're
> using for the build?
>
> * specific Windows OS
> * C compiler and flags
> * build options
> * ​
>
> ​anything else?
>
> Thanks again for all your work on this. We can work this out.
> ​
>
> >
> > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hello;
> > >
> > > FWIW, I am preparing a second round of spelling fixes ... it's a
> > > quite big change. I would prefer to do such changes *after* the
> > > new build system is in place though.
> > >
> > > I can deal easily with any breakage caused by the spelling fixes but
> > > it may not be very fun to have to fix again the build issues so I
> > > would really prefer to chose the battle field ahead of time ;).
> > >
> > > Pedro.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> MzK
>
> "Time spent with cats is never wasted."
>                                 -- Sigmund Freud
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message