openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Fwd: Re: Questions about buildbot internals
Date Sun, 28 Aug 2016 01:01:14 GMT
On 28 Aug, Gav wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Don Lewis <truckman@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote:
>> > Hi Don,
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Don Lewis <truckman@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 28 Aug, Gav wrote:
>> >> > junit 4.11 is installed on the new buildbots we are prepping for use
>> fwiw
>> >>
>> >> We'll also need hamcrest version 1.3.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Ubuntu 14.04 LTS python-hamcrest is version 1.8 , is that too new?
>> > I'd like to try and stick to what the Ubuntu apt-get packages provide,
>> > if not possible, alternate uris where we can get other versions from.
>>
>> We don't want python-hamcrest.  We just want the hamcrest1.3.jar file.
>> I think this is it:
>> <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/hamcrest/hamcrest-
>> all/1.3/hamcrest-all-1.3.jar>
>>
>>
> ok, in that case should we just not add it as a buildbot buildstep to
> download it during a build ?

That was something that Damjan suggested as a possibility, but the
question was whether ext_sources was an appropriate place to stash it as
it is a compiled artifact.

Based on this old bug report:
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/junit/+bug/784631>, you might
want to investigate whether the junit package actually include hamcrest
as well.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message