From dev-return-57817-apmail-openoffice-dev-archive=openoffice.apache.org@openoffice.apache.org Sun Sep 18 05:46:00 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 382681929D for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62712 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2016 05:46:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 62633 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2016 05:45:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 62616 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2016 05:45:59 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:45:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D8EDD180644 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:45:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JVS-yjPbl0bm for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id F35DF5F484 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id l132so99675037wmf.0 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:45:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=6O3N+Y0ulTKaG86w9G43B5QFoPc8k8wnEck30Vk7Cxw=; b=aFLtE15OtiQfyqPO1LVVmMWry1TmuX2pB3rga1v5/I0Kv2ZmQS1j1IfxJznyQASyGW jRw4enMVkQ1aEgGqA2FPPw9zHkqX/EKbAAkqIk1oPMIlC55uI4mybJrWcGdaiUzdQoqd cnbouss7p/mUQ3wX+QXIymGLOo98mbBYPxaMTWqKC3yo736Z892+SZ+/3ejaD98iuyTV ZoFg8atJkOOGgY/+o5Wo1D1DL9V8S+0NgzWxV4aFi7f7Hotx/snDRhQs3DV3DTH3yl2Y lHxKR6yao3mUfcX5zjkwPIPUQGWO1Cdahc05K/MtPwNMObxh++nf61/5vPpk8p/0FTBW S0+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6O3N+Y0ulTKaG86w9G43B5QFoPc8k8wnEck30Vk7Cxw=; b=B1LzY+BsMpC2C5+WsQBsBd1uE3vVJwYKt3VwK+yMUeRP6B2pWQxSkiIDa3xO9M2Ea5 tp+w8XNBrU/YLRZj21h0Rn0haAqOX4yAP2VCHMNHVWV+OV9m2yHceTIifLx3SjItm/57 0u5rMmEJ9KTTHeVqOaewHaJlKPBCpKR8syhiLlUt6ZU2SKeyxdOLGnlrZsqs992Uy2q0 wgxN4L+hKxIKF8xTHu1r0Yd0ybQEx5K6bPBnRCHi3QvluZWRdxfhQORZPZAlNQHiGtbn jCIVEePl8dpFvx5uOhOFfaqOhkGBg0d0kcHFmmWRhfn7QTf+i/Yp5wI72/uGQ/6xFkSg tfLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwN6Q/MFqYkKc6Iv7r4aY8iyCmOpVAaVLMHs9X/KHiSOK4F9ogkuEjUtKUOnMgjBBw== X-Received: by 10.28.15.194 with SMTP id 185mr3921541wmp.58.1474177555617; Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.192.35] (ip-94-114-209-96.unity-media.net. [94.114.209.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g17sm15250525wme.3.2016.09.17.22.45.54 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Sep 2016 22:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 4.1.4 Release Manager? To: dev@openoffice.apache.org References: <85a53e02-99d1-b686-4f0a-669c505d9527@apache.org> <57DAF319.6040000@wtnet.de> <24701B19-8CCF-486E-95AC-3151864E6526@jaguNET.com> <57DB087A.2030602@apache.org> <2B4B1DD5-759B-4CFA-BF40-34CBFD3DFA19@jaguNET.com> <57DC35B7.3050706@wtnet.de> From: Peter Kovacs Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 07:45:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57DC35B7.3050706@wtnet.de> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------232D7BB1E92B99B2C3673B04" --------------232D7BB1E92B99B2C3673B04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hmm, does anyone know an artist that has some time and can draw a splash screen? I would love to see the next edition Called 4.1.3 Phoenix addition, And I would love to see a Splashscreen that shows an Phönix carry the AOOo Logo upward. That would make a statement. Actually thinking of it, if this is liked by the community I would pledge 50 Euro for an acceptable artwork (means liked by AOOo. If this is dev or all involved we could discuss.). Haha. for the followup release I would stay with 4.2.0 as the /life, the universe and everything Version of OOo. I actually like that too much./ 5.0.0 I would like to have for something moonshot like. I have fear you will hate me for what I have in mind, because this is a meocratic Project, and stuff. I did not came around yet to read what Jörg send me for reading to understand you guys more. Hope I manage later to day. But I would call the 5.0.0 Version Sun. Which is also a great Wordgame for something that has been moonshoted and if you look at the history of OO. As Splash I would suggest the Logo with a sun corona. This would be sooooo super cool. I would also pledge some money here for an artist, if the Community agrees. Haha! On 16.09.2016 20:11, Marcus wrote: > Am 09/16/2016 02:07 PM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com] >> >>>>> Any real reason to name it 4.2.0 ? >>>> >>>> Two years of miscellaneous changes and fixes, a radically >>> improved build system, unit tests at build time, updates of a >>> lot of libraries, support for new languages, new >>> translations, new dictionaries... if this is not 4.2.0 it >>> should be named 5.0. >>>> >>> >>> That was kind of my thoughts... or maybe call it 4.5.0 >>> >>> The idea is to represent the "re-charged" AOO project with >>> a meaningful change in version. >> >> OK, an idea which I understand. >> >> But one could, in this context, not to think about a completely >> different way of >> naming? >> >> (a) >> What if we took us Ubuntu as an example? >> >> Ubuntu 4.16 is called "Xenial Xerus" and AOO 4.2 or 4.5 or 5.0 (and >> so on) might >> be called "Lively Phoenix"? (just an example) > > as an addition to the numbering schema this could work. Then we can > give the release a special touch/meaning/expression or whatever is > best for the respective release time frame. > >> (b) >> Or you choose a more formal type of label them. >> OK, "AOO XP" would probably not so great, but what would be, for >> example, with >> "AOO NE" (for new experience)? > > From the view point of a normal user I find it confusing as there is > no comparsion pattern and you don't know what was first and was next. > > I think that the reason that Microsoft has come back to numbers for > the versioning schema. I don't see any need to go their way, make the > same experience and come back to the numbers. > > So, please no version numbering with words/text only. > > Marcus > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org > --------------232D7BB1E92B99B2C3673B04--