openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hagar Delest <>
Subject Re: Bugzilla
Date Sat, 20 May 2017 13:11:31 GMT
Le 20/05/2017 à 12:10, Peter Kovacs a écrit :
> Our best recruitment base is our user base. The more we use them the tighter the link
between user and developer gets, the more probable it is we get people.
> Community feeling is a strong motivator for doing the right thing.
Well, remember that the user base of applications like AOO is not the same as for other more
geek-oriented application in OpenSource field. We face mostly basic users who wants things
done at no cost and with equivalent features to MS Office ones for example. They don't have
any knowledge nor will to engage very far.
According to what we see in the forum, it's rather difficult to even make them file a bug

> And people we have, we lack imho skill. And this we need to build. We need to open ways
into open office development. Set starting points with view little knowledge and need to slowly
guide the volunteers to the deeper end of our projects.
> Currently we don't have roads like I described above, we only have a fast and frightening
Personally, I've very little knowledge of Basic macros (I sometimes help/improve macros in
the forum) and I'm a fan of AOO but doing code (I mean for development) is not in my intention
at all, that's too huge a step.
So, yes, quite a frightening jungle.
Let's face it: LibO seems to be doing better to get devs (that's how I see it from the outside,
I don't know how true it is in reality). So what is the AOO plan exactly? I guess that committers
want to invest their time in a project that has a future so that their own work can last in
that project.
Should AOO be focused on stability and robustness (and less on new features)? Or should it
try to keep up with LibO (at least by implementing features not that hard to code and are
considered must have in LibO)?...

> Getting users to evaluate what is a bug and what is not would be in my eyes a huge step
This is something we do in the forum. We help them investigate and we urge them to file a
report when we can confirm there is indeed a bug (some forum volunteers even file the bug
themselves when the user is not willing).

> Of course the next step would be solving them. But for that we can vote, measure or find
other ways to promote them
As said in my other message, votes are cast in bugzilla. However, in the forum we did see
a clear trend: in the past, users bothered to subscribe bugzilla to vote. They don't anymore.
 They clearly switch to something else (be it LibO or MS Office).

> Maybe slicing them up in micro jobs would work for some.
> Setting up a bazaar another.
> I would like to take one step after another.
> And only do things we think that they work with people we have.
> Because I do believe in that we need to do things in order that people join.
For sure.
What people do see is that there is quite few development and little bug solving. It does
not help to restore trust in the project.
But again, look at this list:
I raised this issue several times on this list and still nothing. Think of how users talk
about AOO after having lost files that way.
I do know that it is not an easy one but it is the kind of bug that definitively damages AOO
reputation. Finding the root cause and fixing it (or changing the save process to avoid it)
would be enough to release a new major version. That would send a clear message that the community
listen to the users.
For the record, I don't have any skills to help devs. However, we spent some time with forum
volunteers trying to find a hint, but nothing interesting so far.

> All the best
> Peter

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message