openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Kovacs <peter.kov...@posteo.de>
Subject Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
Date Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:29:27 GMT
+1 in the release First Switch After.

Am 15. September 2017 04:51:29 MESZ schrieb Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net>:
>We must not block 4.1.4. We must release soon.
>
>Regards,
>Dave
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 7:36 PM, Damjan Jovanovic <damjan@apache.org>
>wrote:
>> 
>> The process is, we vote, then get Infra to switch us.
>> 
>> Many big and small Apache projects have switched to Git, eg. Apache
>Commons.
>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>
>wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would like to add one more condition: We should not move until the
>>> process we will use has been applied successfully to smaller
>projects.
>>> 
>>> I am relatively neutral on the choice of repository, and a lot of
>people
>>> seem to like Git.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 9/14/2017 11:16 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Even when I'm not a real developer, please let me add some points:
>>>> 
>>>> IMHO we could switch when
>>>> 
>>>> - ASF Infra can and will support it
>>>> - the CMS (it manages the webpages) is supporting Git
>>>> - the big majority of us is wanting Git
>>>> - it is known how and save that the SVN commit history can be
>migrated
>>>>   to Git
>>>> 
>>>> PS:
>>>> As Apache project the code has to be at the ASF. I think it's not
>>>> possible to store it somewhere else like, e.g., GitHub.
>>>> 
>>>> Marcus
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 14.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 14.09.2017 13:10, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's
>>>>>> source?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge
>nowdays,
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know
>and
>>>>>> IDEs
>>>>>> support
>(https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016).
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting
>offline,
>>>>>> git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large
>projects,
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> would integrate with GitHub better, etc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What do people think?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Damjan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As much as I prefer GIT for Codemaintenance, I think the central
>REPO
>>>>> should be maintained by Apache Infra.
>>>>> If Infra can move to git, fine. If they do not support it, it is
>also
>>>>> fine to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am at -1 to have our official REPO on GITHUB or another service
>>>>> provider.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And I am not sure if we can not work around the problem to commit
>to SVN
>>>>> from a GIT repo.
>>>>> Have to check.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> All the best
>>>>> Peter
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message