openoffice-dev mailing list archives: December 2020

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Emilie Drd English flyer Tue, 01 Dec, 09:58
Pedro Lino Re: English flyer Tue, 01 Dec, 10:57
Emilie Drd RE: English flyer Tue, 01 Dec, 11:03
Peter Kovacs RE: English flyer Tue, 01 Dec, 13:24
Matthias Seidel Re: English flyer Tue, 01 Dec, 13:30
Jim Jagielski Fwd: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors Tue, 01 Dec, 15:40
Matthias Seidel Re: Fwd: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors Tue, 01 Dec, 16:05
Jim Jagielski Re: [openoffice] branch AOO42X updated: Upgrade to APR(*) 1.6.x and work around Xcode12 over-agressive clang warning/errors Tue, 01 Dec, 16:45
Mel Earley Question re Chromebook Tue, 01 Dec, 18:52
Peter Kovacs Re: Question re Chromebook Tue, 01 Dec, 20:11
Don Lewis Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. Tue, 01 Dec, 23:16
Jim Jagielski Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. Wed, 02 Dec, 03:30
Jim Jagielski Help w/ bt Wed, 02 Dec, 13:34
Damjan Jovanovic Re: Help w/ bt Wed, 02 Dec, 15:25
Marcus Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November Wed, 02 Dec, 18:54
Matthias Seidel Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November Wed, 02 Dec, 19:01
Dave Fisher Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November Wed, 02 Dec, 19:02
Marcus Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November Wed, 02 Dec, 19:07
Marcus Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November Wed, 02 Dec, 19:07
Marcus Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November Wed, 02 Dec, 19:12
Dave Fisher Re: [openoffice-org] branch main updated: Updated download numbers for November Wed, 02 Dec, 19:16
Jim Jagielski Re: Help w/ bt Wed, 02 Dec, 19:30
Matthias Seidel Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. Wed, 02 Dec, 20:50
Don Lewis Re: Help w/ bt Wed, 02 Dec, 21:47
Damjan Jovanovic Re: Help w/ bt Thu, 03 Dec, 02:02
Jim Jagielski macOS - oldest supported version Thu, 03 Dec, 02:42
Matthias Seidel Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. Thu, 03 Dec, 09:33
Peter Kovacs Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux. Thu, 03 Dec, 10:56
Dave Fisher Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Use of strcpy is problematic esp when we don't check bounds. Ugg. Instead use memmove(); Increase buffer sizes due to larger requirements. Thu, 03 Dec, 15:34
Jim Jagielski Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Use of strcpy is problematic esp when we don't check bounds. Ugg. Instead use memmove(); Increase buffer sizes due to larger requirements. Thu, 03 Dec, 16:56
Jim Jagielski Re: Help w/ bt Thu, 03 Dec, 17:08
Jim Jagielski Re: Help w/ bt Thu, 03 Dec, 17:49
Damjan Jovanovic Re: Help w/ bt Thu, 03 Dec, 17:54
Dave Fisher Re: macOS - oldest supported version Thu, 03 Dec, 18:38
Peter Kovacs Re: Help w/ bt Fri, 04 Dec, 07:26
Peter Kovacs Re: macOS - oldest supported version Fri, 04 Dec, 08:19
Tony Loss of OpenOffice Fri, 04 Dec, 16:43
Rory O'Farrell Re: Loss of OpenOffice Fri, 04 Dec, 16:53
Moderator Re: Loss of OpenOffice Fri, 04 Dec, 17:01
Marcus Re: macOS - oldest supported version Fri, 04 Dec, 17:30
Jan Alanco Tämä estää asennuksen Sat, 05 Dec, 08:33
Marcus Re: Tämä estää asennuksen Sat, 05 Dec, 09:58
Eliodoro MIRANDA Request of support for open office calc Sat, 05 Dec, 19:03
GitBox [GitHub] [openoffice] NordMike opened a new pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file Sat, 05 Dec, 19:40
GitBox [GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file Sat, 05 Dec, 19:55
Jim Jagielski Java 1.6 Sat, 05 Dec, 20:20
Matthias Seidel Re: Java 1.6 Sat, 05 Dec, 20:33
Mechtilde Re: Java 1.6 Sat, 05 Dec, 21:04
Larry Gusaas Re: Java 1.6 Sat, 05 Dec, 23:05
F Campos Costero Re: Request of support for open office calc Sun, 06 Dec, 05:55
Dick Groskamp Re: Request of support for open office calc Sun, 06 Dec, 11:36
GitBox [GitHub] [openoffice] NordMike commented on pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file Sun, 06 Dec, 12:07
Bidouille Re: Request of support for open office calc Sun, 06 Dec, 12:25
Mechtilde Review of PR 109 Sun, 06 Dec, 12:57
GitBox [GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #110: Issue #128416 - Fixing failure due to moving absent file Sun, 06 Dec, 13:54
Arrigo Marchiori Re: Review of PR 109 Sun, 06 Dec, 13:59
Mechtilde Re: Review of PR 109 Sun, 06 Dec, 14:11
Matthias Seidel Re: Review of PR 109 Sun, 06 Dec, 14:25
Mechtilde Re: Review of PR 109 Sun, 06 Dec, 14:43
Matthias Seidel Re: Review of PR 109 Sun, 06 Dec, 14:44
Jim Jagielski Re: Java 1.6 Sun, 06 Dec, 15:15
Matthias Seidel Re: Java 1.6 Sun, 06 Dec, 15:19
Matthias Seidel Re: Java 1.6 Sun, 06 Dec, 19:39
Mechtilde Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) Mon, 07 Dec, 06:48
Peter Kovacs Configure missing gtk-plugin Mon, 07 Dec, 06:51
Peter Kovacs Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) Mon, 07 Dec, 06:57
Don Lewis Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin Mon, 07 Dec, 07:04
Peter Kovacs Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin Mon, 07 Dec, 07:24
Arrigo Marchiori Re: How to cope with Python module putting .so files into lib64 instead of lib? Mon, 07 Dec, 07:30
Peter Kovacs Re: How to cope with Python module putting .so files into lib64 instead of lib? Mon, 07 Dec, 07:43
Jim Jagielski Re: Java 1.6 Mon, 07 Dec, 13:46
Peter Kovacs Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin Mon, 07 Dec, 16:04
Mechtilde Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) Mon, 07 Dec, 18:00
Peter Kovacs Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) Mon, 07 Dec, 18:16
Mechtilde Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109) Mon, 07 Dec, 18:26
Peter Kovacs [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 18:38
Mechtilde Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 19:10
Jim Jagielski Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) Mon, 07 Dec, 19:35
Jörg Schmidt RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 19:46
Jim Jagielski Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 19:48
Jörg Schmidt RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 19:52
Mechtilde [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 20:51
Mechtilde Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) Mon, 07 Dec, 20:56
Jim Jagielski Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 21:11
Jim Jagielski Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 21:19
Peter Kovacs Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 21:27
Jörg Schmidt RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 21:35
Peter Kovacs Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 22:02
Jim Jagielski Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 22:03
Peter Kovacs Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) Mon, 07 Dec, 22:07
Peter Kovacs Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Mon, 07 Dec, 22:09
Dave Fisher Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) Mon, 07 Dec, 22:34
Peter Kovacs Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) Tue, 08 Dec, 00:51
Peter Kovacs Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)) Tue, 08 Dec, 01:06
Damjan Jovanovic Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Tue, 08 Dec, 02:06
Keith N. McKenna Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Tue, 08 Dec, 02:48
Jörg Schmidt RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Tue, 08 Dec, 08:14
Jörg Schmidt RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Tue, 08 Dec, 08:27
Jörg Schmidt RE: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Tue, 08 Dec, 08:27
Peter Kovacs Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Tue, 08 Dec, 08:46
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Jan 2021311
Dec 2020581
Nov 2020386
Oct 2020558
Sep 2020304
Aug 2020171
Jul 2020267
Jun 2020137
May 2020260
Apr 2020256
Mar 202082
Feb 2020246
Jan 2020149
Dec 201966
Nov 2019202
Oct 2019253
Sep 2019135
Aug 2019161
Jul 2019113
Jun 201952
May 201995
Apr 201959
Mar 201966
Feb 2019166
Jan 2019337
Dec 2018144
Nov 2018292
Oct 2018248
Sep 2018284
Aug 2018193
Jul 2018160
Jun 201884
May 201871
Apr 2018156
Mar 2018302
Feb 2018201
Jan 2018200
Dec 2017316
Nov 2017331
Oct 2017626
Sep 2017154
Aug 2017247
Jul 2017164
Jun 2017182
May 2017232
Apr 201792
Mar 2017169
Feb 2017189
Jan 2017337
Dec 2016255
Nov 2016265
Oct 2016535
Sep 2016800
Aug 2016443
Jul 2016221
Jun 201686
May 2016142
Apr 2016212
Mar 2016329
Feb 2016320
Jan 2016267
Dec 2015284
Nov 2015319
Oct 2015368
Sep 2015435
Aug 2015322
Jul 2015368
Jun 2015234
May 2015176
Apr 2015258
Mar 2015375
Feb 2015403
Jan 2015542
Dec 2014496
Nov 2014273
Oct 2014439
Sep 2014467
Aug 2014546
Jul 2014575
Jun 2014509
May 2014547
Apr 2014798
Mar 2014663
Feb 2014647
Jan 2014661
Dec 2013624
Nov 2013694
Oct 20131073
Sep 20131123
Aug 20131460
Jul 20131609
Jun 20131222
May 2013991
Apr 20131107
Mar 2013934
Feb 20131219
Jan 20131429
Dec 20121161
Nov 20121370
Oct 20121627
Sep 20121379
Aug 20121724
Jul 20121680
Jun 20122081
May 20122640
Apr 20121579
Mar 20121993
Feb 20121209
Jan 20121268
Dec 20111417
Nov 20111749
Oct 20111672
Sep 20111928
Aug 20111901
Jul 20111267
Jun 20111439