openoffice-l10n mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jan iversen <>
Subject Re: danish translation, bug 121179
Date Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:59:28 GMT
See below please.

On 25 October 2012 16:08, J├╝rgen Schmidt <> wrote:

> On 10/25/12 3:47 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:00:28PM +0200, jan iversen wrote:
> >> Ups, I did not check that I generated it myself.
> >
> > If you generated the SDF yourself from trunk, then it won't match with
> > what is coming from pootle: AFAIK trunk is in 3.5, and the translations
> > in pootle are on 3.4 branch (that's why you may find unstranslated
> > strings though pootle may tell you you are 100%).
> >
> Jan, the translated po files available via the issue 121179 are based on
> the po files that I have provided, correct?
Yes !!! I have not updated any other po files than the ones you gave me, so
they fit for 3.4.1

> Ariel is correct, that on trunk we have potentially already some new
> strings, or strings have changed. Well I am not aware of bigger changes
> but who knows.

There are a couple of new strings, I have written back to ariel....and of
course I am a bit wrong being on the bleeding edge with the sources.

> I think we should create a new AOO next translation project soon that
> will focus on UI changes for the next release.
I am not sure what you mean by "project", if you mean a separate SVN I
would not like it.

But if you mean getting prepared for the release I am all for it. I am
working right now on the new l10n web, and that would be a good place to
include the translation timeline of either 3.4.2 or 4.0 whatever is due.

Reminding me, do you know if the apache server for, has
XBitHack (for SSI) activated ? Ariel suggested I should ask infra, but
being "nobdody" changes for an answer is similar.

> Juergen

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message