From l10n-return-2284-apmail-openoffice-l10n-archive=openoffice.apache.org@openoffice.apache.org Sat Aug 3 11:50:34 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-l10n-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-l10n-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 228CF10A4B for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 11:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33734 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2013 11:50:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-l10n-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 33604 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2013 11:50:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: l10n@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list l10n@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 33596 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2013 11:50:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:50:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.113.200.5] (HELO homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:50:26 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DFF5718; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 04:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [151.67.84.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andrea@pescetti.it) by homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3136A5716; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 04:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51FCEE54.8000904@apache.org> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 13:49:40 +0200 From: Andrea Pescetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: l10n@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Pootle and SDF update actions (Re: Ukrainian 4.0 Pootle) References: <51F66894.10007@gmail.com> <51F75D75.3070602@gmail.com> <51F76C5C.7020406@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51F76C5C.7020406@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 30/07/2013 J=FCrgen Schmidt wrote: > In general I would tend to synchronize all but I would like to avoid > overhead as well. If there is nobody working on a language it will take > our time to work with this files for nothing. > What do others think? Should we focus on active languages and add > further languages on demand only? Or should do a one time shot and > synchronize all to remove the sdf files and have everything as po files > as part of Jan's work. In this moment, the best solution (which requires a lot of work,=20 unfortunately; but it would be a one-time update) would be: 1) For languages that have 3.4.1 but not 4.0.0 in Pootle (e.g., bg or=20 sr): update Pootle-3.4.1 -> trunk SDF files as a backup, to save work=20 done so far. 2) For languages that have 4.0.0 in Pootle: update Pootle-4.0.0 -> trunk=20 SDF files, to get corrections done after 4.0 was released (e.g., de) 3) Import all files, for all the 120+ supported languages, back from SDF=20 to Pootle, in a new "4.0.1" project or in the old 4.0.0 project as=20 Juergen/Jan see best for the sake of releases and the new genLang. 4) Remove the old 3.4.1 (and 4.0.0) from Pootle so that we only have one=20 active Pootle project, in sync with trunk, and we can immediately use=20 volunteers who in the current setting have to wait and can't do anything=20 (like, at the moment, sr, sh and bg). Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-help@openoffice.apache.org