phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Podling report proposal
Date Thu, 09 Jan 2014 21:44:19 GMT
Ok, thanks.

On Thursday, January 9, 2014, Stack wrote:

> Sorry about that Andrew.  It looks like we are to make these markings
> ourselves and Marvin helped out by filling in a few of the lads meantime
> till we got w/ the program.
>
> I went to Edit the report and it has this on the top:
>
> "[image: /!\] *FINAL* [image: /!\]
>
> This report has been submitted to the Board. Please do not edit further."
>
>
> Another report is due next month.  We can do it right next time around?
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > And I would like the signed-off-by state of the current report fixed.
> > Thanks again.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org<javascript:;>
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I gave a +1 for this report on private@phoenix yet was left off the
> > > signed-off-by list. That is not acceptable, I am committed to being
> > > diligent here. Are we going to do these on private@ or on dev@?
> Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:56 AM, James Taylor Gmail <
> > > giacomotaylor@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> No update: waiting on paperwork from Intel which is expected today or
> > >> tomorrow.
> > >>
> > >> On Jan 9, 2014, at 5:18 AM, Steven Noels <stevenn@apache.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014, at 09:02 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> My thinking is that having the dev traffic come through our Apache
> > >> >> mailing
> > >> >> list, but pointing folks back to our github repo would be
> confusing.
> > >> The
> > >> >> current plan is to get this done early next week. If it drags
on
> > >> longer,
> > >> >> we
> > >> >> can always change plans.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Sound reasonable?
> > >> >
> > >> > Makes perfect sense, thanks. Any update on the IP clearance bit?
> > >> >
> > >> > Steven.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message