phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Podling report proposal
Date Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:37:17 GMT
And I would like the signed-off-by state of the current report fixed.
Thanks again.


On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> I gave a +1 for this report on private@phoenix yet was left off the
> signed-off-by list. That is not acceptable, I am committed to being
> diligent here. Are we going to do these on private@ or on dev@? Thanks.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:56 AM, James Taylor Gmail <
> giacomotaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No update: waiting on paperwork from Intel which is expected today or
>> tomorrow.
>>
>> On Jan 9, 2014, at 5:18 AM, Steven Noels <stevenn@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014, at 09:02 PM, James Taylor wrote:
>> >
>> >> My thinking is that having the dev traffic come through our Apache
>> >> mailing
>> >> list, but pointing folks back to our github repo would be confusing.
>> The
>> >> current plan is to get this done early next week. If it drags on
>> longer,
>> >> we
>> >> can always change plans.
>> >>
>> >> Sound reasonable?
>> >
>> > Makes perfect sense, thanks. Any update on the IP clearance bit?
>> >
>> > Steven.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message