phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Dimiduk <>
Subject Re: best development methodology for Apache git?
Date Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:42:04 GMT
Hi James,

I don't have any good recommendations for preserving your Github-based
community on the Apache infrastructure. Maybe our friends on other Apache
projects that have made the transition, such as Storm or Mesos, have
experience to share?

Outside of Github, I've been very happy using Gerrit [0] for git-based code
review. It supports a workflow such that commits to the "central"
repository can only be performed via its web interface and only after the
necessary +1 has been received. This also lets you enforce different commit
policies, including a fast-forward-only workflow (ie, a SVN-like linear
commit history). I'm afraid I've never configured a public git repository,
nor Gerrit, so my advice ends there.

There's this old ticket [1] which hasn't received much attention.

Let me know if I can provide more concrete assistance.



On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Devaraj Das <> wrote:

> And there is reviewboard which is pretty widely used in HBase for the
> code review (and that works off git repo too)..
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Devaraj Das <>
> wrote:
> > Hey James, couldn't we use the jira comments as a way to
> > discuss/feedback, even though we use git repo?
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:47 PM, James Taylor <>
> wrote:
> >> I know you HBase guys use svn as your source of truth, but Phoenix is
> using
> >> git. With our old git repo which was hosted on github, we'd typically do
> >> work locally and then send a pull request to the source-of-truth github
> >> repo. That way others could comment on the pending commit before it was
> >> pulled in. Pulling it in could be done with a single click by someone
> with
> >> write privileges.
> >>
> >> Now, though, our source-of-truth is *not* on github, but on a git repo
> >> hosted by Apache. It's only mirrored to github in a read-only manner.
> Plus,
> >> it may be lagging behind the source-of-truth repo.
> >>
> >> What's the best, recommended methodology and ui to use for getting
> feedback
> >> pre-commit?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> James
> --
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message