phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Fork branch '4.0' into branches '4.0' and '4.1'
Date Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:48:48 GMT
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:34 AM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
wrote:

> The original intent of the 4.0 branch was meant to host all 4.x
> releases. In general releases are compatible in the following manner:
> - a minor release must be deployed first on the server and then at any
> point later on the client. It will require a rolling restart, but no
> downtime.
> - a patch release may be deployed on the client and server in either
> order. If the patch requires the server jar to be deployed (which
> would likely be most of the time), it will require a rolling restart
> and no downtime will be required.
> - a major release may require downtime, as it may require the client
> and server side to both be deployed together.
>

If you like ​I could make an alternate proposal to rename the branches to
branch-4 (and branch-3), then. ​

Having a branch named '4.0' that builds releases 4.1.x is bound to confuse,
IMHO.



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message