phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0
Date Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:29:07 GMT
Yes please I think we need a 4.8.x that fixes PHOENIX-3407 on 1.2+ before
moving on to 4.9 and up.


On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, <larsh@apache.org> wrote:

> Was going to do it this week. Then again, since 4.9.0 does not include the
> column encoding I was less enthused about it.If we think we want a 4.8.2
> I'll spin an RC today.
> -- Lars
>
>       From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
>  To: "dev@phoenix.apache.org" <dev@phoenix.apache.org>
> Cc: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>  Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 11:41 AM
>  Subject: Re: 4.8.2 and/or 4.9.0
>
> Right, I think we should address PHOENIX-3407 in current 4.8.x releases
> with a fixed version of it. I don't think we can ever fully understand the
> version usage patterns of our users. I've seen folks write in to HBase
> lists using 4 year old releases for unfathomable reasons.
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:38 AM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Andrew. One question: are there users on 4.8.0 or 4.8.1 who would
> > not want to upgrade to 4.9.0? We're in the voting stage for a 4.9.0 which
> > has all the fixes in 4.8 branch (and more) and is compatible (as usual)
> > with 4.8 releases through rolling restarts. At SFDC, we'll move to 4.9.0.
> >
> > One thing is clear, though. Given PHOENIX-3407 (and HBASE-14465), users
> on
> > HBase 1.2 should not use 4.8.0 or 4.8.1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Need help with making a 4.8.2? I could try my hand at making a Phoenix
> > > release.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:06 PM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Current plan is to have a 4.9.0 RC in that same timeframe (by 10/31)
> > with
> > > > the column encoding work (PHOENIX-1598 and PHOENIX-2565) and
> PHOENIX-6
> > > > (atomic insert/update).  If it's too much much for you to do both
> 4.8.2
> > > and
> > > > 4.9 simultaneously, I can volunteer to be the RM for 4.9.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:42 PM, <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > we have 20 jiras against 4.8.2 some of which seem important enough
> > ...
> > > > and
> > > > > over 200 against 4.9.0.
> > > > > I think we should start keeping stable branches for longer.As
> before
> > > I'll
> > > > > volunteer doing 4.8.2 as well as a 4.9.0.
> > > > > Let's think about a 4.8.2 in two weeks or so, unless there're
> vastly
> > > > > different opinions.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Lars
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>   - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message