pirk-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ellison Anne Williams <eawilli...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.2.0-incubating Release
Date Fri, 07 Oct 2016 01:01:26 GMT
Hi Guys,

The vote passes with five +1 binding votes and no -1 votes. I will now call
a vote on general@.

Thanks!

Ellison Anne

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 06/10/16 05:02, Josh Elser wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > * L&N good
> > * xsums/sigs OK
> > * mvn apache-rat:check passes
> > * can build from source
> >
> > Things to look into for next release:
> >
> > * apache-pirk-0.2.0-incubating.jar appears to have way too many LICENSE
> > entries (the MIT/BSD licensed stuff doesn't appear to be included).
> > Seems like they were meant for the -exe.jar. Probably just
> > maven-jar-plugin being a little over-aggressive :)
>
> Yeah, the license entries in the built apache-pirk-0.2.0-incubating.jar
> come from
> apache-pirk-0.2.0-incubating/src/main/resources/META-INF/
> bin-license-notice/
> in the release.
>
> The licenses were placed there to avoid confusion in the source release.
>  There are plans for how to address the licenses in the binaries (see
> below).
>
> > Assorted other thoughts:
> >
> > For 0.1.0, I remember that there were some JARs also staged, but it
> > doesn't look like these ever made it to Maven Central. Are there any
> > plans to do this? Not having these JARs in Central may become an
> > impediment to adoption.
>
> You will recall that there were a number of problems in getting the
> licenses and notice files correct for these binary releases; and the
> work to fix it would be "wasted" as the code gets restructured into
> Maven modules which handle the l&n files better.
>
> So for the moment, we agreed to only release the source zip, and delay
> distributing convenience binaries until after the restructuring.  DarinJ
> has put forward a proposed rework that is looking good.
>
> > Reminded me of some docs that I pushed earlier this week specifically
> > around this[1]. Having a shaded jars with all the deps is great, as well
> > as just the Pirk codebase. One thing that is good to enable people to do
> > is to create their own shaded artifact with versions of dependencies
> > they want (e.g. Hadoop-2.7.1 instead of 2.7.3).
>
> Yep, the plan is to get there.  As you say, the docs look useful for
> those looking to tweak the dependency versions.
>
> > Finally:
> >
> > I'm also super happy to see an 0.2.0 release without a bit of pestering.
> > Great work! :)
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> > - Josh
> >
> > [1] http://calcite.apache.org/avatica/docs/custom_client_artifacts.html
> >
> > Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> This is the vote for the 0.2.0-incubating (source only) release of
> Apache
> >> Pirk (incubating).
> >>
> >> The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on Thursday,
> >> October
> >> 6. If it passes, it will be submitted to general@ for Apache Incubator
> >> voting.
> >>
> >> The artifacts can be downloaded here:
> >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pirk/0.2.0-incubating/
> >>
> >>
> >> or from the Maven staging repo here:
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepirk-1006
> >>
> >>
> >> All JIRAs completed for this release can be viewed here:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >> projectId=12320320&version=12338108
> >>
> >>
> >> The artifacts have been signed with key : 1FD8849B
> >>
> >> Please vote accordingly:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.2.0-incubating release
> >> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.2.0-incubating release
> >> because...
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message