pivot-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Brind <bri...@brindy.org.uk>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Version numbers in JAR file names
Date Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:08:36 GMT
I agree.

2009/6/5 Greg Brown <gkbrown@mac.com>

> Right. Also, we already voted on this once and came to an agreement - I
> didn't want anyone to be suprised that we were suddenly revisiting it with a
> new vote, so I started a discussion thread first.
>
> So, let's see if we can get consensus on this. I am in favor of version
> numbers in the file names, and apparently so is Todd. What do others think?
> If we agree, I'd suggest that we make this change in conjunction with the
> package name change and adding src/doc JARs to the binary distribution, and
> do so in the near future.
>
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Todd Volkert wrote:
>
>  This topic was highly contentious last time around, which is probably why
>> Greg was thinking of a vote.  But then again, perhaps opinions have
>> changed.  I was probably the biggest proponent of versioned jars in the
>> past, and my opinion hasn't changed.
>>
>> -T
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
>> martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Just to be clear: when there consensus has been achieved, there's no
>>> need for an official vote, unless it is something legally binding such
>>> as new committer, pmc member or release.
>>>
>>> Martijn
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Todd Volkert<tvolkert@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (in favor of a vote :) )
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Greg Brown <gkbrown@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I know we have already voted on this once, but I think it is
>>>>> appropriate
>>>>>
>>>> to
>>>
>>>> raise this issue again given our recent discussion of package names and
>>>>> adherence to convention. I would be in favor of a re-vote on this issue
>>>>>
>>>> and
>>>
>>>> would be likely to advocate embedding version numbers in JAR file names
>>>>>
>>>> at
>>>
>>>> this point. If no one has any significant objections, I will put this to
>>>>>
>>>> a
>>>
>>>> vote.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>>>
>>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message