pivot-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Brown <gkbr...@mac.com>
Subject Re: When are you going to move packages to org.apache.pivot?
Date Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:04:51 GMT
They have always been "pivot.*" by design. I've personally never been  
a big fan of the "org.*" or "com.*" naming scheme. I think it is  
outdated and needlessly verbose (.NET doesn't use it, and it makes the  
code more readable, IMO).

Also, not all Java package names begin with "org" or "com"; e.g.  
"java.*", "javax.*", and "javafx.*". Pivot provides functionality that  
competes directly with classes that live in these packages. The  
"pivot.*" name is meant to convey a stronger sense of credibility - it  
implies that these classes are on par with their JDK equivalents.  
Otherwise, they seem less "official". It would be unfortunate if we  
had to change it.

On Jun 5, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Christopher Brind<brindy@brindy.org.uk 
> > wrote:
>> - Is it compulsory?  It makes sense, but I just wonder if it is  
>> mandated.
> To the point of getting harassed vehemently. AFAIK it is a blocker for
> graduation. All incubating projects have done so, and the only reason
> not to do it is having to comply with a standard.
> Martijn

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message