pivot-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noel Grandin <noelgran...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: When are you going to move packages to org.apache.pivot?
Date Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:16:54 GMT

Consider this sentiment seconded.

Greg Brown wrote:
> They have always been "pivot.*" by design. I've personally never been
> a big fan of the "org.*" or "com.*" naming scheme. I think it is
> outdated and needlessly verbose (.NET doesn't use it, and it makes the
> code more readable, IMO).
>
> Also, not all Java package names begin with "org" or "com"; e.g.
> "java.*", "javax.*", and "javafx.*". Pivot provides functionality that
> competes directly with classes that live in these packages. The
> "pivot.*" name is meant to convey a stronger sense of credibility - it
> implies that these classes are on par with their JDK equivalents.
> Otherwise, they seem less "official". It would be unfortunate if we
> had to change it.
>
>


Mime
View raw message