pivot-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Version numbers in JAR file names
Date Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:31:47 GMT
Just to be clear: when there consensus has been achieved, there's no
need for an official vote, unless it is something legally binding such
as new committer, pmc member or release.


On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Todd Volkert<tvolkert@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (in favor of a vote :) )
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Greg Brown <gkbrown@mac.com> wrote:
>> I know we have already voted on this once, but I think it is appropriate to
>> raise this issue again given our recent discussion of package names and
>> adherence to convention. I would be in favor of a re-vote on this issue and
>> would be likely to advocate embedding version numbers in JAR file names at
>> this point. If no one has any significant objections, I will put this to a
>> vote.

Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

View raw message