pivot-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Bartlett <cbartlet...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.0.1 release
Date Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:28:57 GMT
Yep, 6 months is way too long, but with only a few committers whose time is
limited, it has just ended up that way.

Hopefully Piotr's road map question and Greg's friendly push will be enough
to kick start the 2.0.1 process..

On 23 June 2011 01:20, Edvin Syse <edvin@sysedata.no> wrote:

> I think 6 months is long between each release, but if you release snapshots
> atleast each month and update the webpage to show info on the latest
> snapshot, you can atleast show that the project is moving forward :)
>
> Den 22.06.2011 20:04, skrev Chris Bartlett:
>
>  I'm not sure there would be enough changes to justify official *releases*
>> as
>> regularly as one per month, but I imagine that regular snapshot builds
>> could
>> be made available for download.
>>
>> http://ci.apache.org/
>> I will try to read up on what is available to us.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> On 23 June 2011 00:16, Greg Brown<gk_brown@verizon.net>  wrote:
>>
>>  Get the latest source from SVN and build/test the release artifacts (run
>>> the demos/tutorials/test apps and make sure that nothing is broken). Once
>>> validated, a release vote can be called for (though a PMC member will
>>> need
>>> to do that part).
>>>
>>> Releasing once a month would be aggressive. But if someone is willing to
>>> take responsibility for it, I don't see any reason why not.
>>>
>>> On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote:
>>>
>>>  what is involved in "get the ball rolling"?
>>>>
>>>> can you start releasing 2.0.x versions once a month?
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message  --------
>>>> Subject: 2.0.1 release
>>>> From: Greg Brown<gk_brown@verizon.net>
>>>> To: Pivot Dev<dev@pivot.apache.org>
>>>> Date: Wed 22 Jun 2011 10:16:40 AM CDT
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the 2.0.1 release is long overdue. Open-source projects without
>>>>>
>>>> frequent releases seem dead and lose users.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I unfortunately cannot drive the process, but I can help validate the
>>>>>
>>>> release if someone is willing to get the ball rolling. Are there any
>>> volunteers?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Greg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message