plc4x-dev mailing list archives: January 2019

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating)
Stefan Bodewig   Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Wed, 02 Jan, 11:34
Christofer Dutz     Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Wed, 02 Jan, 12:55
Stefan Bodewig       Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Wed, 02 Jan, 15:56
Julian Feinauer         Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Thu, 03 Jan, 09:28
Christofer Dutz         Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Fri, 04 Jan, 10:03
Markus Sommer   AW: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Mon, 07 Jan, 11:32
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [133]' Thu, 03 Jan, 14:07
Christofer Dutz   Re: [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [133]' Thu, 03 Jan, 14:25
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [134]' Thu, 03 Jan, 14:58
Re: Update to the C++ Module
Christofer Dutz   Re: Update to the C++ Module Thu, 03 Jan, 14:10
Markus Sommer     AW: Update to the C++ Module Mon, 07 Jan, 09:34
Christofer Dutz       Re: Update to the C++ Module Mon, 07 Jan, 10:19
Christofer Dutz Profinet Spec Fri, 04 Jan, 12:43
Christofer Dutz New Article on PLC4X available ... Tue, 08 Jan, 10:33
Christofer Dutz Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 09:45
Julian Feinauer   Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 10:13
Christofer Dutz     Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 10:18
Christofer Dutz       Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:06
Christofer Dutz         Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:17
Markus Sommer           AW: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:20
Christofer Dutz             Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:34
Markus Sommer               AW: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:40
Sebastian Wiendl         Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:18
Christofer Dutz           Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:37
Sebastian Wiendl             Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:41
Christofer Dutz               Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:57
Sebastian Wiendl                 Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 15:46
Christofer Dutz                   Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 16:00
Sebastian Wiendl                     Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 16:21
Christofer Dutz                       Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 16:49
Julian Feinauer                         Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:16
Christofer Dutz                         Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:26
Julian Feinauer                           Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:46
Christofer Dutz                             Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:58
Julian Feinauer                               Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 18:01
Markus Sommer                               AW: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Thu, 10 Jan, 09:33
Christofer Dutz                                 Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Thu, 10 Jan, 09:41
Christofer Dutz                                   Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 09:15
Julian Feinauer                                     Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 09:33
Otto Fowler                                       Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 12:12
Christofer Dutz                                         Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 15:43
Otto Fowler                                           Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 16:33
Julian Feinauer Nightly Builds Wed, 09 Jan, 17:25
Christofer Dutz   Re: Nightly Builds Wed, 09 Jan, 17:28
Julian Feinauer     Re: Nightly Builds Wed, 09 Jan, 17:33
Julian Feinauer Time for a new release 0.3.0? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:55
Christofer Dutz   Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? Wed, 09 Jan, 18:01
Julian Feinauer   Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? Wed, 16 Jan, 07:09
Christofer Dutz     Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? Wed, 16 Jan, 08:18
Christofer Dutz       Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? Thu, 17 Jan, 08:14
Tim Mitsch [S7] (manual) testing vs physical device Tue, 15 Jan, 09:50
Julian Feinauer   Re: [S7] (manual) testing vs physical device Tue, 15 Jan, 10:31
Christofer Dutz     Re: [S7] (manual) testing vs physical device Tue, 15 Jan, 10:47
GitBox [GitHub] timbo2k opened a new pull request #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 13:41
[GitHub] JulianFeinauer commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement
GitBox   [GitHub] JulianFeinauer commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 18:05
GitBox   [GitHub] JulianFeinauer commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 20:34
GitBox [GitHub] ottobackwards commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 19:44
GitBox [GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 19:48
GitBox [GitHub] JulianFeinauer merged pull request #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 20:39
Christofer Dutz Added a new "development" profile -> Please activate during development Wed, 16 Jan, 08:43
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [4]'
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [4]' Wed, 16 Jan, 12:00
Apache Jenkins Server     [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [5]' Wed, 23 Jan, 11:54
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [139]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:27
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [140]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:32
Apache Jenkins Server     [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [141]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:41
Apache Jenkins Server       [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [142]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:44
Apache Jenkins Server         [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [143]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:56
Apache Jenkins Server           [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [144]' Wed, 16 Jan, 16:42
Justin Mclean Trouble building on OSX Wed, 16 Jan, 19:56
Christofer Dutz   Re: Trouble building on OSX Wed, 16 Jan, 20:18
Justin Mclean     Re: Trouble building on OSX Wed, 16 Jan, 20:39
Christofer Dutz       Re: Trouble building on OSX Thu, 17 Jan, 10:07
Christofer Dutz         Re: Trouble building on OSX Thu, 17 Jan, 10:33
Julian Feinauer           Re: Trouble building on OSX Thu, 17 Jan, 11:17
Christofer Dutz             Re: Trouble building on OSX Thu, 17 Jan, 11:59
GitBox [GitHub] timbo2k opened a new pull request #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:17
[GitHub] timbo2k commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int
GitBox   [GitHub] timbo2k commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:27
GitBox   [GitHub] timbo2k commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:42
[GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int
GitBox   [GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:32
GitBox   [GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:40
GitBox [GitHub] chrisdutz merged pull request #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:42
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [147]' Wed, 16 Jan, 20:57
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [148]' Wed, 16 Jan, 21:35
Christofer Dutz Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Thu, 17 Jan, 08:59
Justin Mclean   Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Thu, 17 Jan, 17:42
Christofer Dutz     Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Thu, 17 Jan, 21:30
Julian Feinauer       Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Fri, 18 Jan, 06:59
Christofer Dutz         Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Fri, 18 Jan, 08:50
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [154]' Thu, 17 Jan, 14:16
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [155]' Thu, 17 Jan, 14:27
Apache Jenkins Server     [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [156]' Thu, 17 Jan, 14:40
Apache Jenkins Server       [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [157]' Thu, 17 Jan, 15:25
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [159]' Thu, 17 Jan, 22:35
Christofer Dutz   Re: [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [159]' Fri, 18 Jan, 06:22
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [160]' Fri, 18 Jan, 09:14
Apache Jenkins Server     [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [161]' Fri, 18 Jan, 09:53
Julian Feinauer Meetup or Code-Retreat Fri, 18 Jan, 08:30
Markus Sommer   AW: Meetup or Code-Retreat Fri, 18 Jan, 12:56
Christofer Dutz     Re: Meetup or Code-Retreat Fri, 18 Jan, 13:20
Christofer Dutz New CVE Check plugin (WAS: [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [159]') Fri, 18 Jan, 08:31
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [162]' Fri, 18 Jan, 09:41
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [163]' Fri, 18 Jan, 10:36
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [164]' Fri, 18 Jan, 10:21
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [165]' Fri, 18 Jan, 11:45
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [168]' Fri, 18 Jan, 13:09
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [169]' Fri, 18 Jan, 13:59
Christofer Dutz Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 13:40
Julian Feinauer   Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 14:15
Christofer Dutz     Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 14:28
Justin Mclean       Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 19:55
Justin Mclean     Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 19:57
Christofer Dutz       Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 20:35
Christofer Dutz         Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 20:46
Otto Fowler           Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 21:13
Otto Fowler             Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 21:41
Christofer Dutz             Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Fri, 18 Jan, 22:45
Justin Mclean               Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Sat, 19 Jan, 00:48
Christofer Dutz                 Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Sat, 19 Jan, 09:58
Julian Feinauer                   Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Sat, 19 Jan, 10:28
Christofer Dutz                     Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Sat, 19 Jan, 10:52
Christofer Dutz                       Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Sat, 19 Jan, 18:16
Christofer Dutz                   Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Sat, 19 Jan, 10:31
Otto Fowler   Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Sat, 19 Jan, 13:22
Christofer Dutz     Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Sat, 19 Jan, 17:19
Otto Fowler   Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt Sun, 20 Jan, 15:32
Christofer Dutz Protocol Definitions and Testing with Daffodil Mon, 21 Jan, 14:40
l...@code-house.org   Re: Protocol Definitions and Testing with Daffodil Wed, 23 Jan, 09:57
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [176]' Mon, 21 Jan, 15:08
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [177]' Mon, 21 Jan, 15:56
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [175]' Mon, 21 Jan, 15:18
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [181]' Tue, 22 Jan, 11:02
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [182]' Tue, 22 Jan, 13:32
Julian Feinauer [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 13:31
Christofer Dutz   Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 14:40
Julian Feinauer     Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 14:42
Justin Mclean       Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 16:58
Julian Feinauer         Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Fri, 25 Jan, 08:08
Julian Feinauer [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 13:46
Julian Feinauer   Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 13:54
Otto Fowler     Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 14:02
Christofer Dutz       Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 14:03
Christofer Dutz     Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 14:02
Justin Mclean     Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 Thu, 24 Jan, 16:56
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [188]' Thu, 24 Jan, 15:52
Apache Jenkins Server   [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [189]' Thu, 24 Jan, 16:28
Apache Jenkins Server     [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [190]' Thu, 24 Jan, 17:10
Christofer Dutz Summary of a private personal chat with Markus Fri, 25 Jan, 12:27
Julian Feinauer   Re: Summary of a private personal chat with Markus Fri, 25 Jan, 13:11
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Jan 202159
Dec 2020138
Nov 202095
Oct 2020112
Sep 2020191
Aug 2020179
Jul 2020217
Jun 2020132
May 2020265
Apr 2020157
Mar 2020201
Feb 2020167
Jan 2020181
Dec 2019100
Nov 201979
Oct 2019140
Sep 2019107
Aug 2019154
Jul 2019112
Jun 2019101
May 2019231
Apr 2019232
Mar 2019272
Feb 2019116
Jan 2019170
Dec 201895
Nov 2018116
Oct 2018162
Sep 2018223
Aug 2018235
Jul 201844
Jun 201823
May 201821
Apr 201819
Mar 201851
Feb 2018136
Jan 2018109
Dec 201775