|
Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) |
|
| Stefan Bodewig |
Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) |
Wed, 02 Jan, 11:34 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) |
Wed, 02 Jan, 12:55 |
| Stefan Bodewig |
Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) |
Wed, 02 Jan, 15:56 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) |
Thu, 03 Jan, 09:28 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) |
Fri, 04 Jan, 10:03 |
| Markus Sommer |
AW: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) |
Mon, 07 Jan, 11:32 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [133]' |
Thu, 03 Jan, 14:07 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [133]' |
Thu, 03 Jan, 14:25 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [134]' |
Thu, 03 Jan, 14:58 |
|
Re: Update to the C++ Module |
|
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Update to the C++ Module |
Thu, 03 Jan, 14:10 |
| Markus Sommer |
AW: Update to the C++ Module |
Mon, 07 Jan, 09:34 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Update to the C++ Module |
Mon, 07 Jan, 10:19 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Profinet Spec |
Fri, 04 Jan, 12:43 |
| Christofer Dutz |
New Article on PLC4X available ... |
Tue, 08 Jan, 10:33 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 09:45 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 10:13 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 10:18 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 14:06 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 14:17 |
| Markus Sommer |
AW: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 14:20 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 14:34 |
| Markus Sommer |
AW: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 14:40 |
| Sebastian Wiendl |
Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 14:18 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 14:37 |
| Sebastian Wiendl |
Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 14:41 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 14:57 |
| Sebastian Wiendl |
Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 15:46 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 16:00 |
| Sebastian Wiendl |
Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 16:21 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 16:49 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 17:16 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 17:26 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 17:46 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 17:58 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 18:01 |
| Markus Sommer |
AW: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Thu, 10 Jan, 09:33 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Thu, 10 Jan, 09:41 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Tue, 15 Jan, 09:15 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Tue, 15 Jan, 09:33 |
| Otto Fowler |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Tue, 15 Jan, 12:12 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Tue, 15 Jan, 15:43 |
| Otto Fowler |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? |
Tue, 15 Jan, 16:33 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Nightly Builds |
Wed, 09 Jan, 17:25 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Nightly Builds |
Wed, 09 Jan, 17:28 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Nightly Builds |
Wed, 09 Jan, 17:33 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Time for a new release 0.3.0? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 17:55 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? |
Wed, 09 Jan, 18:01 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? |
Wed, 16 Jan, 07:09 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? |
Wed, 16 Jan, 08:18 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? |
Thu, 17 Jan, 08:14 |
| Tim Mitsch |
[S7] (manual) testing vs physical device |
Tue, 15 Jan, 09:50 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: [S7] (manual) testing vs physical device |
Tue, 15 Jan, 10:31 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: [S7] (manual) testing vs physical device |
Tue, 15 Jan, 10:47 |
| GitBox |
[GitHub] timbo2k opened a new pull request #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement |
Tue, 15 Jan, 13:41 |
|
[GitHub] JulianFeinauer commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement |
|
| GitBox |
[GitHub] JulianFeinauer commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement |
Tue, 15 Jan, 18:05 |
| GitBox |
[GitHub] JulianFeinauer commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement |
Tue, 15 Jan, 20:34 |
| GitBox |
[GitHub] ottobackwards commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement |
Tue, 15 Jan, 19:44 |
| GitBox |
[GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement |
Tue, 15 Jan, 19:48 |
| GitBox |
[GitHub] JulianFeinauer merged pull request #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement |
Tue, 15 Jan, 20:39 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Added a new "development" profile -> Please activate during development |
Wed, 16 Jan, 08:43 |
|
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [4]' |
|
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [4]' |
Wed, 16 Jan, 12:00 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [5]' |
Wed, 23 Jan, 11:54 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [139]' |
Wed, 16 Jan, 15:27 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [140]' |
Wed, 16 Jan, 15:32 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [141]' |
Wed, 16 Jan, 15:41 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [142]' |
Wed, 16 Jan, 15:44 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [143]' |
Wed, 16 Jan, 15:56 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [144]' |
Wed, 16 Jan, 16:42 |
| Justin Mclean |
Trouble building on OSX |
Wed, 16 Jan, 19:56 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Trouble building on OSX |
Wed, 16 Jan, 20:18 |
| Justin Mclean |
Re: Trouble building on OSX |
Wed, 16 Jan, 20:39 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Trouble building on OSX |
Thu, 17 Jan, 10:07 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Trouble building on OSX |
Thu, 17 Jan, 10:33 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Trouble building on OSX |
Thu, 17 Jan, 11:17 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Trouble building on OSX |
Thu, 17 Jan, 11:59 |
| GitBox |
[GitHub] timbo2k opened a new pull request #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int |
Wed, 16 Jan, 20:17 |
|
[GitHub] timbo2k commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int |
|
| GitBox |
[GitHub] timbo2k commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int |
Wed, 16 Jan, 20:27 |
| GitBox |
[GitHub] timbo2k commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int |
Wed, 16 Jan, 20:42 |
|
[GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int |
|
| GitBox |
[GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int |
Wed, 16 Jan, 20:32 |
| GitBox |
[GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int |
Wed, 16 Jan, 20:40 |
| GitBox |
[GitHub] chrisdutz merged pull request #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int |
Wed, 16 Jan, 20:42 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [147]' |
Wed, 16 Jan, 20:57 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [148]' |
Wed, 16 Jan, 21:35 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... |
Thu, 17 Jan, 08:59 |
| Justin Mclean |
Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... |
Thu, 17 Jan, 17:42 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... |
Thu, 17 Jan, 21:30 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... |
Fri, 18 Jan, 06:59 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... |
Fri, 18 Jan, 08:50 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [154]' |
Thu, 17 Jan, 14:16 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [155]' |
Thu, 17 Jan, 14:27 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [156]' |
Thu, 17 Jan, 14:40 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [157]' |
Thu, 17 Jan, 15:25 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [159]' |
Thu, 17 Jan, 22:35 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [159]' |
Fri, 18 Jan, 06:22 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [160]' |
Fri, 18 Jan, 09:14 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [161]' |
Fri, 18 Jan, 09:53 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Meetup or Code-Retreat |
Fri, 18 Jan, 08:30 |
| Markus Sommer |
AW: Meetup or Code-Retreat |
Fri, 18 Jan, 12:56 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Meetup or Code-Retreat |
Fri, 18 Jan, 13:20 |
| Christofer Dutz |
New CVE Check plugin (WAS: [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [159]') |
Fri, 18 Jan, 08:31 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [162]' |
Fri, 18 Jan, 09:41 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [163]' |
Fri, 18 Jan, 10:36 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [164]' |
Fri, 18 Jan, 10:21 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [165]' |
Fri, 18 Jan, 11:45 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [168]' |
Fri, 18 Jan, 13:09 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [169]' |
Fri, 18 Jan, 13:59 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 13:40 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 14:15 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 14:28 |
| Justin Mclean |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 19:55 |
| Justin Mclean |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 19:57 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 20:35 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 20:46 |
| Otto Fowler |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 21:13 |
| Otto Fowler |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 21:41 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Fri, 18 Jan, 22:45 |
| Justin Mclean |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Sat, 19 Jan, 00:48 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Sat, 19 Jan, 09:58 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Sat, 19 Jan, 10:28 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Sat, 19 Jan, 10:52 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Sat, 19 Jan, 18:16 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Sat, 19 Jan, 10:31 |
| Otto Fowler |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Sat, 19 Jan, 13:22 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Sat, 19 Jan, 17:19 |
| Otto Fowler |
Re: Hardening our build ... what I learnt |
Sun, 20 Jan, 15:32 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Protocol Definitions and Testing with Daffodil |
Mon, 21 Jan, 14:40 |
| l...@code-house.org |
Re: Protocol Definitions and Testing with Daffodil |
Wed, 23 Jan, 09:57 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [176]' |
Mon, 21 Jan, 15:08 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [177]' |
Mon, 21 Jan, 15:56 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [175]' |
Mon, 21 Jan, 15:18 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [181]' |
Tue, 22 Jan, 11:02 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [182]' |
Tue, 22 Jan, 13:32 |
| Julian Feinauer |
[VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 13:31 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 14:40 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 14:42 |
| Justin Mclean |
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 16:58 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Fri, 25 Jan, 08:08 |
| Julian Feinauer |
[DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 13:46 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 13:54 |
| Otto Fowler |
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 14:02 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 14:03 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 14:02 |
| Justin Mclean |
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 RC1 |
Thu, 24 Jan, 16:56 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [188]' |
Thu, 24 Jan, 15:52 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [189]' |
Thu, 24 Jan, 16:28 |
| Apache Jenkins Server |
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [190]' |
Thu, 24 Jan, 17:10 |
| Christofer Dutz |
Summary of a private personal chat with Markus |
Fri, 25 Jan, 12:27 |
| Julian Feinauer |
Re: Summary of a private personal chat with Markus |
Fri, 25 Jan, 13:11 |