plc4x-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Feinauer <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Users page
Date Tue, 26 May 2020 07:18:10 GMT

yes. Just wanted to add my point here : )
But of course some feedback is very welcome about best practices.

Perhaps we could even hold a formal vote to give it the necessary attention on the list?


Am 26.05.20, 09:16 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <>:

    Hi Julian,

    I like the name "adopters" ... sounds better than "users" especially if it's on the "users"
part of the website.

    I would like some feedback from some other ASF folks as in the past they have brought
up concerns and I would prefer to hear if they are ok with this.


    Am 26.05.20, 09:07 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <>:

        Hi Chris,

        thanks for tackling this.
        I really like it and in fact I woul dprobably place it even more prominent.
        I like how eclipse IoT Working Group did it:

        I see no reason why this would not comply with ASF policy.


        Am 25.05.20, 21:43 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <>:

            Hi all,

            I think we discussed this multiple times but never actually continued. So I took
the liberty of adding a new page to our website:

            However this page isn’t linked in the navigation as I want to discuss this first.

            It’s the plan to allow any company to be listed there. The mechanism on how
to get added is by providing a PR. This way we have someone who is in git-blame and which
we can say is responsible for having a company added.

            I updated all links to be “nofollow” links and to open new browser tabs.

            Would such a page be in-line with the ASF policies?


View raw message