plc4x-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject Re: Passive vs active drivers
Date Sun, 17 May 2020 16:35:47 GMT
Hi Lukasz,

well you could start implementing an active BacNet driver and simply use the UDP/TCP transport.
In this case you only need to provide the libpcap if you really use the passive mode.

Chris


Am 17.05.20, 00:09 schrieb "Łukasz Dywicki" <luke@code-house.org>:

    Hey,
    I am checking BACnet driver in order to make it working with live
    stream, but I am not quite sure how to adjust it to be inline with
    overall direction.
    Passive mode is related to pcap transport thus it is really depending on
    that. On other hand there are some specific configurations which needs
    to be set in order to get pcap parsed.

    So, how to start with passive-active drivers? Keeping passive option is
    very tempting especially for isolated environments.

    Cheers,
    Łukasz

Mime
View raw message