plc4x-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otto Fowler <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Add better PLC4X-API support for Input Dialogs
Date Fri, 29 May 2020 12:06:27 GMT
 I thought it would have already done that

On May 29, 2020 at 05:13:12, Christofer Dutz (

I fully agree that we need such a thing.


Am 29.05.20, 10:50 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <>:

Hi folks,

this is an old Issue (see
What I generally would like to have is a way to communicate with the API /
the Driver without needing a Connection to e.g. „talk“ about the address
input and probably also the connection parameters.

To give you an example, consider I want to have a mask where users could
enter their url and address.
It would be nice to get all available protocols

Map<String, Driver> map = driverManager.getAllRegisteredProtocols()

to show it in a drop down.
When user selects one I could generate a form to enter all connection


And then, when he wants to enter a Field Address I could go on like that
and could do many things already with the Driver without hte need to have a
Conneciton in Place already. Like:

driver.validate(„%DB.asdf“) <-- fails
driver.getValidatingRegex() <-- Could be used in my forms

or even get more detailed information, like an abstract address
specification that I could use to build a form.
For S7 this could for example be

List<AddressPart> driver.getAddressParts()

which could be something like

MemoryPart <- Enum-Like „DB, Q, I, ...“ and so on.

Tob e clear: I ONLY want to extend the current API and not change anything
setup. So all APIs would stay in Place as is but this would help people who
allow their users to input PLC4X Informations like we do or e.g.
Streampipes (thus, added as CC here).



  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message